These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37393742)

  • 1. ProGleason-GAN: Conditional progressive growing GAN for prostatic cancer Gleason grade patch synthesis.
    Golfe A; Del Amor R; Colomer A; Sales MA; Terradez L; Naranjo V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Oct; 240():107695. PubMed ID: 37393742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
    Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. WeGleNet: A weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Naranjo V
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2021 Mar; 88():101846. PubMed ID: 33485056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-Learning for Weakly Supervised Gleason Grading of Local Patterns.
    Silva-Rodriguez J; Colomer A; Dolz J; Naranjo V
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Aug; 25(8):3094-3104. PubMed ID: 33621184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
    Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variance of Tumor Grade at Radical Prostatectomy With Assessment of Each Tumor Nodule Versus Global Grading.
    Iakymenko OA; Briski LM; Punnen S; Nemov I; Lugo I; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Aug; 146(8):1032-1036. PubMed ID: 34752602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
    Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of the 2014 Gleason grade grouping in a Canadian cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer.
    Wissing M; Brimo F; Chevalier S; Scarlata E; McKercher G; O'Flaherty A; Aprikian S; Thibodeau V; Saad F; Carmel M; Lacombe L; Têtu B; Ekindi-Ndongo N; Latour M; Trudel D; Aprikian A
    BJU Int; 2019 Apr; 123(4):624-631. PubMed ID: 30113732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 (grade group 4) prostate cancer-a rare occurrence with contemporary grading.
    Kryvenko ON; Williamson SR; Schwartz LE; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2020 Mar; 97():40-51. PubMed ID: 31923450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy.
    Diolombi ML; Epstein JI
    BJU Int; 2017 Jun; 119(6):872-878. PubMed ID: 27496532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
    Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on the grade group system's prognostic performance.
    Kato M; Hirakawa A; Kobayashi Y; Yamamoto A; Ishida R; Sano T; Kimura T; Majima T; Ishida S; Funahashi Y; Sassa N; Fujita T; Matsukawa Y; Yamamoto T; Hattori R; Gotoh M; Tsuzuki T
    Prostate; 2019 Jul; 79(10):1065-1070. PubMed ID: 31025722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of unpaired image-to-image translation for stain color normalization in colorectal cancer histology classification.
    Altini N; Marvulli TM; Zito FA; Caputo M; Tommasi S; Azzariti A; Brunetti A; Prencipe B; Mattioli E; De Summa S; Bevilacqua V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Jun; 234():107511. PubMed ID: 37011426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques.
    Melo PAS; Estivallet CLN; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Leite KRM
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e3198. PubMed ID: 34730614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
    Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oncologic outcomes of organ-confined Gleason grade group 4-5 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Preisser F; Wang N; Abrams-Pompe RS; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 40(4):161.e9-161.e14. PubMed ID: 34973856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.
    Sauter G; Steurer S; Clauditz TS; Krech T; Wittmer C; Lutz F; Lennartz M; Janssen T; Hakimi N; Simon R; von Petersdorff-Campen M; Jacobsen F; von Loga K; Wilczak W; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Chirico V; Haese A; Heinzer H; Beyer B; Graefen M; Michl U; Salomon G; Steuber T; Budäus LH; Hekeler E; Malsy-Mink J; Kutzera S; Fraune C; Göbel C; Huland H; Schlomm T
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):592-598. PubMed ID: 26542947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.