115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37393832)
21. Exploratory Field Testing of Passive Exoskeletons in Several Manufacturing Environments: Perceived Usability and User Acceptance.
Schwerha D; McNamara N; Kim S; Nussbaum MA
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2022; 10(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 35354354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Learning Designers as Expert Evaluators of Usability: Understanding Their Potential Contribution to Improving the Universality of Interface Design for Health Resources.
Adams A; Miller-Lewis L; Tieman J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 36901617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Moderated digital social therapy for young people with emerging mental health problems: A user-centered mixed-method design and usability study.
van Doorn M; Monsanto A; Boeschoten CM; van Amelsvoort T; Popma A; Öry FG; Alvarez-Jimenez M; Gleeson J; Jaspers MWM; Nieman DH
Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():1020753. PubMed ID: 36698649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The amount of ergonomics and user involvement in 151 design processes.
Kok BN; Slegers K; Vink P
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():989-96. PubMed ID: 22316850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Usability evaluation with mental health professionals and young people to develop an Internet-based cognitive-behaviour therapy program for adolescents with anxiety disorders.
Wozney L; Baxter P; Newton AS
BMC Pediatr; 2015 Dec; 15():213. PubMed ID: 26675420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Satellite-based terrestrial production efficiency modeling.
McCallum I; Wagner W; Schmullius C; Shvidenko A; Obersteiner M; Fritz S; Nilsson S
Carbon Balance Manag; 2009 Sep; 4():8. PubMed ID: 19765285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Mobile Web App to Improve Health Screening Uptake in Men (ScreenMen): Utility and Usability Evaluation Study.
Teo CH; Ng CJ; Lo SK; Lim CD; White A
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e10216. PubMed ID: 30985280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A preliminary report of breast cancer screening by positron emission mammography.
Yamamoto Y; Tasaki Y; Kuwada Y; Ozawa Y; Inoue T
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 26586370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. User experience and usability when the automated driving system fails: Findings from a field experiment.
Liu P; Jiang Z; Li T; Wang G; Wang R; Xu Z
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Oct; 161():106383. PubMed ID: 34469855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Health Communication Assessment of Web-based Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patient Education Materials.
Robbins R; Dudley KA; Monten KN; Le C; Hanes S; Patel SR; Bertisch SM
ATS Sch; 2022 Mar; 3(1):48-63. PubMed ID: 35634002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluating the usability of a cancer registry system using Cognitive Walkthrough, and assessing user agreement with its problems.
Bagheri F; Abbasi F; Sadeghi M; Khajouei R
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Jan; 23(1):23. PubMed ID: 36717854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Acceptability and usability of self-collected sampling for HPV testing among African-American women living in the Mississippi Delta.
Scarinci IC; Litton AG; Garcés-Palacio IC; Partridge EE; Castle PE
Womens Health Issues; 2013; 23(2):e123-30. PubMed ID: 23410619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Design, development, and evaluation of printed educational materials for evidence-based practice dissemination.
Williams JR; Caceda-Castro LE; Dusablon T; Stipa M
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2016 Jun; 14(2):84-94. PubMed ID: 26735568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care.
Stossel LM; Segar N; Gliatto P; Fallar R; Karani R
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Sep; 27(9):1165-70. PubMed ID: 22528620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors associated with the intention to undergo Pap smear testing in the rural areas of Indonesia: a health belief model.
Sumarmi S; Hsu YY; Cheng YM; Lee SH
Reprod Health; 2021 Jun; 18(1):138. PubMed ID: 34193195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of a Web-Based Decision Aid and Planning Tool for Family Building After Cancer (Roadmap to Parenthood): Usability Testing.
Benedict C; Dauber-Decker KL; Ford JS; King D; Spiegel D; Schapira L; Simon P; Diefenbach M
JMIR Cancer; 2022 May; 8(2):e33304. PubMed ID: 35639461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Chatbot for Perinatal Women's and Partners' Obstetric and Mental Health Care: Development and Usability Evaluation Study.
Chung K; Cho HY; Park JY
JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Mar; 9(3):e18607. PubMed ID: 33656442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development, usability and quality evaluation of the resilient mobile application for women with breast cancer.
Rezaee R; Asadi S; Yazdani A; Rezvani A; Kazeroon AM
Health Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 5(4):e708. PubMed ID: 35782301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Readability of printed educational materials used to inform potential and actual ostomates.
Coey L
J Clin Nurs; 1996 Nov; 5(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 8981858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Molecular composition of GAG-collagen I multilayers affects remodeling of terminal layers and osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells.
Zhao M; Altankov G; Grabiec U; Bennett M; Salmeron-Sanchez M; Dehghani F; Groth T
Acta Biomater; 2016 Sep; 41():86-99. PubMed ID: 27188244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
