143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37394876)
1. Reply to: Adler et al.'s Melanoma diagnosis at a specialist dermatology practice without the use of photographic surveillance.
Brown H; De'Ambrosis B; Yong-Gee S; Muir J
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Nov; 64(4):e399-e400. PubMed ID: 37394876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reply to: Is photographic surveillance in melanoma diagnosis dispensable?
Brown H; De'Ambrosis B; Yong-Gee S; Muir J
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Aug; 64(3):e309-e310. PubMed ID: 37224337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is photographic surveillance in melanoma diagnosis dispensable?
Rosendahl C
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Aug; 64(3):e315-e316. PubMed ID: 37186285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Practice Gaps in Dermatology: Melanocytic Lesions and Melanoma.
Marino ML; Carrera C; Marchetti MA; Marghoob AA
Dermatol Clin; 2016 Jul; 34(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 27363893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dynamic dermoscopic features of melanoma and benign naevi by sequential digital dermoscopic imaging and total body photography in a high-risk Australian cohort.
Nguyen J; Doolan BJ; Pan Y; Vestergaard T; Paul E; McLean C; Haskett M; Kelly J; Mar V; Chamberlain A
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Feb; 64(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 36652275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Melanoma diagnosis at a specialist dermatology practice without the use of photographic surveillance.
Brown H; De'Ambrosis B; Yong-Gee S; Griffin A; Muir J
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 May; 64(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 36774586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic tools used for melanoma: A survey of Australian general practitioners and dermatologists.
Nguyen J; Ting S; Paul E; Smith AL; Watts CG; Kelly J; Cust AE; Mar V
Australas J Dermatol; 2021 Aug; 62(3):300-309. PubMed ID: 33860932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficiency of Detecting New Primary Melanoma Among Individuals Treated in a High-risk Clinic for Skin Surveillance.
Guitera P; Menzies SW; Coates E; Azzi A; Fernandez-Penas P; Lilleyman A; Badcock C; Schmid H; Watts CG; Collgros H; Liu R; van Kemenade C; Mann GJ; Cust AE
JAMA Dermatol; 2021 May; 157(5):521-530. PubMed ID: 33729464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the efficacy of 3D total-body photography with sequential digital dermoscopy in a high-risk melanoma cohort: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Primiero CA; McInerney-Leo AM; Betz-Stablein B; Whiteman DC; Gordon L; Caffery L; Aitken JF; Eakin E; Osborne S; Gray L; Smithers BM; Janda M; Soyer HP; Finnane A
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e032969. PubMed ID: 31712348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of primary melanoma in individuals at extreme high risk: a prospective 5-year follow-up study.
Moloney FJ; Guitera P; Coates E; Haass NK; Ho K; Khoury R; O'Connell RL; Raudonikis L; Schmid H; Mann GJ; Menzies SW
JAMA Dermatol; 2014 Aug; 150(8):819-27. PubMed ID: 24964862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre-operative diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions: in vivo dermoscopy performs better than dermoscopy on photographic images.
Carli P; De Giorgi V; Argenziano G; Palli D; Giannotti B
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2002 Jul; 16(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 12224689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence-based dermoscopy.
Menzies SW
Dermatol Clin; 2013 Oct; 31(4):521-4, vii. PubMed ID: 24075541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial.
Bowns IR; Collins K; Walters SJ; McDonagh AJ
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Nov; 10(43):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-39. PubMed ID: 17049140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semi-automated total body photography can identify subtle melanomas but false-negatives on automated comparison highlight the need for manual side-by-side image comparison.
Hassani M; Lee C; Marozava A; Rosendahl N; O'Brien B; Wallace S; Rosendahl C
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 May; 64(2):e193-e196. PubMed ID: 36843046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reply to: 'Melanoma diagnosis at a specialist dermatology practice without the use of photographic surveillance'.
Adler NR; Cust AE; Mar VJ; Martin LK; Guitera P
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Aug; 64(3):e307-e308. PubMed ID: 37228230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Value of Total Body Photography for the Early Detection of Melanoma: A Systematic Review.
Hornung A; Steeb T; Wessely A; Brinker TJ; Breakell T; Erdmann M; Berking C; Heppt MV
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33578996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The importance of total-body photography and sequential digital dermatoscopy for monitoring patients at increased melanoma risk.
Deinlein T; Michor C; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Schmid-Zalaudek K; Fink-Puches R
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2020 Jul; 18(7):692-697. PubMed ID: 32597015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A reply to 'Evaluation of dynamic dermoscopic features of melanoma and benign naevi by sequential digital dermoscopic imaging and total body photography in a high-risk Australian cohort'.
Gonzalez Matheus G; Muir J
Australas J Dermatol; 2023 Aug; 64(3):e303-e304. PubMed ID: 37559201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective use of sequential digital dermoscopy imaging allows a cost reduction in the melanoma detection process: a belgian study of patients with a single or a small number of atypical nevi.
Tromme I; Devleesschauwer B; Beutels P; Richez P; Praet N; Sacré L; Marot L; Van Eeckhout P; Theate I; Baurain JF; Lambert J; Legrand C; Thomas L; Speybroeck N
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109339. PubMed ID: 25313898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital Dermoscopy Photographs Outperform Handheld Dermoscopy in Melanoma Diagnosis.
Mintsoulis D; Beecker J
J Cutan Med Surg; 2016 Nov; 20(6):602-605. PubMed ID: 27270098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
