These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [The measurement of voice quality and voice capacity to penetrate background noise and multidimensional voice program]. Pahn J; Dahl R; Pahn E Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(6):308-16. PubMed ID: 11721137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test. Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Children's Subjective Ratings and Opinions of Typical and Dysphonic Voice After Performing a Language Comprehension Task in Background Noise. Brännström KJ; Holm L; Lyberg-Åhlander V; Haake M; Kastberg T; Sahlén B J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):624-30. PubMed ID: 25873548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study. Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is children's listening effort in background noise influenced by the speaker's voice quality? Sahlén B; Haake M; von Lochow H; Holm L; Kastberg T; Brännström KJ; Lyberg-Åhlander V Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Jul; 43(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 28511620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation? Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs. Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can older adults enhance the intelligibility of their speech? Smiljanic R J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL129-35. PubMed ID: 23363193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual-Auditory and Acoustical Analysis of the Voices of Transgender Women. Schwarz K; Fontanari AMV; Costa AB; Soll BMB; da Silva DC; de Sá Villas-Bôas AP; Cielo CA; Bastilha GR; Ribeiro VV; Dorfman MEKY; Lobato MIR J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):602-608. PubMed ID: 28965663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type. Deroche ML; Culling JF J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children. Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pure linguistic interference during comprehension of competing speech signals. Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P; Kösem A J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL249. PubMed ID: 28372048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling. Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the perception of voicing in syllable-initial plosives in noise. Jiang J; Chen M; Alwan A J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1092-105. PubMed ID: 16521771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]