146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37399353)
1. A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of Bone Volume Variations of Extra-alveolar Region Based on Sex, Age, Vertical and Sagittal Facial Patterns.
Ling C; Shen Y; Zhang X; Ding X
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 34(7):e660-e664. PubMed ID: 37399353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variability associated with maxillary infrazygomatic crest and palatal bone width, height, and angulation in subjects with different vertical facial growth types: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study.
Patel B; De Rose J; Nash J; Sekula M; Gioia C; Deguchi T; Gudhimella S; Gandhi V
Angle Orthod; 2024 May; 94(3):313-319. PubMed ID: 38195059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status.
Gandhi V; Upadhyay M; Tadinada A; Yadav S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jan; 159(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 33221093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CBCT comparison of buccal shelf bone thickness in adult Dravidian population at various sites, depths and angulation - A retrospective study.
Sreenivasagan S; Sivakumar A
Int Orthod; 2021 Sep; 19(3):471-479. PubMed ID: 34172417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A 3D comparison of dimension of infrazygomatic crest region in different vertical skeletal patterns: A retrospective study.
Murugesan A; Jain RK
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):770-775. PubMed ID: 32978079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.
Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Bellocchio AM; Spinuzza P; Caprioglio A; Perillo L; Matarese G; Cordasco G
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):745-751. PubMed ID: 28598220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf characteristics in the Colombian population: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Escobar-Correa N; Ramírez-Bustamante MA; Sánchez-Uribe LA; Upegui-Zea JC; Vergara-Villarreal P; Ramírez-Ossa DM
Korean J Orthod; 2021 Jan; 51(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 33446618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
Park J; Cho HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of infrazygomatic crest dimensions in different vertical facial growth types for miniscrew insertion: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Husseini B; Younes R; Baumgaertel S; El Wak T; El Osta N; Bassil-Nassif N; Bouserhal J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Dec; 162(6):917-926. PubMed ID: 36109268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients.
Elshebiny T; Palomo JM; Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):505-511. PubMed ID: 29602342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Miniscrew insertion sites of infrazygomatic crest and mandibular buccal shelf in different vertical craniofacial patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Matias M; Flores-Mir C; Almeida MR; Vieira BDS; Freitas KMS; Nunes DC; Ferreira MC; Ursi W
Korean J Orthod; 2021 Nov; 51(6):387-396. PubMed ID: 34803027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular buccal shelf and infrazygomatic crest thicknesses in patients with different vertical facial heights.
Vargas EOA; Lopes de Lima R; Nojima LI
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Sep; 158(3):349-356. PubMed ID: 32862936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tomographic assessment of infrazygomatic crest bone depth for extra-alveolar miniscrew insertion in subjects with different vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns.
Tavares A; Montanha-Andrade K; Cury PR; Crusoé-Rebello I; Neves FS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 33908170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf bone characteristics between two facial types using cone beam computed tomography.
Ramasamy P; Sabrish S; Pattabiraman V; Shivamurthy PG; Sagarkar R; Mathew S
Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(3):277-281. PubMed ID: 36656188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular alveolar bone thickness in untreated Class I subjects with different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Formosa J; Zou M; Chung CH; Boucher NS; Li C
Angle Orthod; 2023 Nov; 93(6):683-694. PubMed ID: 37922389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safe sites for orthodontic miniscrew insertion in the infrazygomatic crest area in different facial types: A tomographic study.
Lima A; Domingos RG; Cunha Ribeiro AN; Rino Neto J; de Paiva JB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jan; 161(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 34391619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ideal transverse position of mandibular first molars based on CBCT-derived alveolar bone coverage.
Sampermans G; Sawaljanow A; Proff P; Kirschneck C; Paddenberg E
Ann Anat; 2022 Apr; 241():151908. PubMed ID: 35183706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental and skeletal changes in the upper and lower jaws after treatment with Schwarz appliances using cone-beam computed tomography.
Tai K; Park JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 21189775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography.
Wang HM; Shen JW; Yu MF; Chen XY; Jiang QH; He FM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1123-9. PubMed ID: 25216138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
