BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37400295)

  • 1. Evaluating clinical efficacy of hospital-based surveillance with mammography and ultrasonography for breast cancer.
    Han HJ; Huang CS; Lu TP; Tseng LM; Chie WC; Huang CC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2024 Jan; 123(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 37400295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan.
    Hou MF; Chuang HY; Ou-Yang F; Wang CY; Huang CL; Fan HM; Chuang CH; Wang JY; Hsieh JS; Liu GC; Huang TJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Apr; 28(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 12049952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk.
    Lee JM; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Smith RA; Henderson LM; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA Intern Med; 2019 May; 179(5):658-667. PubMed ID: 30882843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
    Autier P; Boniol M
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection Rates for Benign and Malignant Diagnoses on Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Statewide Mammography Registry Study.
    Fujii MH; Herschorn SD; Sowden M; Hotaling EL; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Sprague BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Mar; 212(3):706-711. PubMed ID: 30673339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.
    Fenton JJ; Xing G; Elmore JG; Bang H; Chen SL; Lindfors KK; Baldwin LM
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Apr; 158(8):580-7. PubMed ID: 23588746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
    Nowicki A; Stogowska I
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.
    Ernster VL; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Zheng Y; Weaver DL; Cutter G; Yankaskas BC; Rosenberg R; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Taplin SH; Urban N; Geller BM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(20):1546-54. PubMed ID: 12381707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of surveillance mammography outcomes in women with a personal history of breast cancer.
    Lowry KP; Braunstein LZ; Economopoulos KP; Salama L; Lehman CD; Gazelle GS; Halpern EF; Giess CS; Taghian AG; Lee JM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Aug; 171(1):209-215. PubMed ID: 29748762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Performance in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer, 2007-2016.
    Lee JM; Ichikawa LE; Wernli KJ; Bowles E; Specht JM; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL; Lowry KP; Tosteson ANA; Stout NK; Houssami N; Onega T; Buist DSM
    Radiology; 2021 Aug; 300(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 34003059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast Cancer Screening With Mammography Plus Ultrasonography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women 50 Years or Younger at Diagnosis and Treated With Breast Conservation Therapy.
    Cho N; Han W; Han BK; Bae MS; Ko ES; Nam SJ; Chae EY; Lee JW; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kim SI; Kim SM; Kang E; Choi Y; Kim HH; Moon WK
    JAMA Oncol; 2017 Nov; 3(11):1495-1502. PubMed ID: 28655029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.
    Robertson C; Arcot Ragupathy SK; Boachie C; Dixon JM; Fraser C; Hernández R; Heys S; Jack W; Kerr GR; Lawrence G; MacLennan G; Maxwell A; McGregor J; Mowatt G; Pinder S; Ternent L; Thomas RE; Vale L; Wilson R; Zhu S; Gilbert FJ
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Sep; 15(34):v-vi, 1-322. PubMed ID: 21951942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 23980217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
    Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Abraham LA; Lehman CD; Yankaskas BC; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Voeks JH; Geller BM; Carney PA; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.
    Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K;
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
    Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.