BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37400295)

  • 21. Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.
    Miglioretti DL; Zhu W; Kerlikowske K; Sprague BL; Onega T; Buist DS; Henderson LM; Smith RA;
    JAMA Oncol; 2015 Nov; 1(8):1069-77. PubMed ID: 26501844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study.
    Lång K; Josefsson V; Larsson AM; Larsson S; Högberg C; Sartor H; Hofvind S; Andersson I; Rosso A
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):936-944. PubMed ID: 37541274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by screening mammography in Taiwan: a single institute's experience.
    Han HJ; Chu YC; Wang J; Lai YC; Tseng LM; Huang CC
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):330. PubMed ID: 37344800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.
    Warner E; Plewes DB; Hill KA; Causer PA; Zubovits JT; Jong RA; Cutrara MR; DeBoer G; Yaffe MJ; Messner SJ; Meschino WS; Piron CA; Narod SA
    JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(11):1317-25. PubMed ID: 15367553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.
    Sung JS; Stamler S; Brooks J; Kaplan J; Huang T; Dershaw DD; Lee CH; Morris EA; Comstock CE
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 27097237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice.
    Fenton JJ; Abraham L; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Carney PA; D'Orsi C; Elmore JG; Barlow WE;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Aug; 103(15):1152-61. PubMed ID: 21795668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study.
    Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP
    Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women aged 40-49 years with a moderate family history of breast cancer: a single-arm cohort study.
    Duffy SW; Mackay J; Thomas S; Anderson E; Chen TH; Ellis I; Evans G; Fielder H; Fox R; Gui G; Macmillan D; Moss S; Rogers C; Sibbering M; Wallis M; Warren R; Watson E; Whynes D; Allgood P; Caunt J
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Mar; 17(11):vii-xiv, 1-95. PubMed ID: 23489892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patterns and determinants of receipt of follow-up mammography and/or clinical examination in a cohort of Italian breast cancer survivors.
    Giuliani O; Mancini S; Puliti D; Caranci N; Ravaioli A; Vattiato R; Palumbo M; Colamartini A; Biggeri A; Bucchi L; Amadori D; Falcini F
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 158(3):543-51. PubMed ID: 27393619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts.
    Crystal P; Strano SD; Shcharynski S; Koretz MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 12818853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography.
    Buchberger W; Niehoff A; Obrist P; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Dünser M
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2000 Aug; 21(4):325-36. PubMed ID: 11014255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk italian 1 study): final results.
    Sardanelli F; Podo F; Santoro F; Manoukian S; Bergonzi S; Trecate G; Vergnaghi D; Federico M; Cortesi L; Corcione S; Morassut S; Di Maggio C; Cilotti A; Martincich L; Calabrese M; Zuiani C; Preda L; Bonanni B; Carbonaro LA; Contegiacomo A; Panizza P; Di Cesare E; Savarese A; Crecco M; Turchetti D; Tonutti M; Belli P; Maschio AD;
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 21139507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Su YR; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Buist DSM; Onega T; Henderson LM; Alsheik N; Bissell MCS; O'Meara ES; Lee CI; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA; 2022 Jun; 327(22):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 35699706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer.
    Warner E; Plewes DB; Shumak RS; Catzavelos GC; Di Prospero LS; Yaffe MJ; Goel V; Ramsay E; Chart PL; Cole DE; Taylor GA; Cutrara M; Samuels TH; Murphy JP; Murphy JM; Narod SA
    J Clin Oncol; 2001 Aug; 19(15):3524-31. PubMed ID: 11481359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast cancer risk characteristics of women undergoing whole-breast ultrasound screening versus mammography alone.
    Sprague BL; Ichikawa L; Eavey J; Lowry KP; Rauscher G; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Chen S; Lee JM; Stout NK; Mandelblatt JS; Alsheik N; Herschorn SD; Perry H; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer; 2023 Aug; 129(16):2456-2468. PubMed ID: 37303202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sonographic surveillance for the detection of contralateral metachronous breast cancer in an Asian population.
    Kim MJ; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Park BW; Kim SI; Sohn J; Oh KK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jan; 192(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 19098203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Barclay J; Grady D; Sickles EA; Ernster V
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jan; 89(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 8978410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.