BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37400892)

  • 1. Outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zuo Y; Tan R; Qin C
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Jul; 18(1):206. PubMed ID: 37400892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bicuspid aortic valve durability with valve-sparing aortic root replacement: comparison to tricuspid valve.
    Levine D; Patel P; Zhao Y; Childress P; Chung M; Leshnower BG; Kurlansky P; Smith CR; Chen EP; Takayama H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 36702459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Haemodynamic outcome at four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging following valve-sparing aortic root replacement with tricuspid and bicuspid valve morphology.
    Semaan E; Markl M; Malaisrie SC; Barker A; Allen B; McCarthy P; Carr JC; Collins JD
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 May; 45(5):818-25. PubMed ID: 24317086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with stenotic bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kanjanahattakij N; Horn B; Vutthikraivit W; Biso SM; Ziccardi MR; Lu MLR; Rattanawong P
    Clin Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 41(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 29896777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic root replacement with bicuspid valve reimplantation: Are outcomes and valve durability comparable to those of tricuspid valve reimplantation?
    Mokashi SA; Rosinski BF; Desai MY; Griffin BP; Hammer DF; Kalahasti V; Johnston DR; Rajeswaran J; Roselli EE; Blackstone EH; Svensson LG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 163(1):51-63.e5. PubMed ID: 32684389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis with first- and new-generation bioprostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ueshima D; Nai Fovino L; Brener SJ; Fabris T; Scotti A; Barioli A; Giacoppo D; Pavei A; Fraccaro C; Napodano M; Tarantini G
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Jan; 298():76-82. PubMed ID: 31575495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Mylotte D; Lefevre T; Søndergaard L; Watanabe Y; Modine T; Dvir D; Bosmans J; Tchetche D; Kornowski R; Sinning JM; Thériault-Lauzier P; O'Sullivan CJ; Barbanti M; Debry N; Buithieu J; Codner P; Dorfmeister M; Martucci G; Nickenig G; Wenaweser P; Tamburino C; Grube E; Webb JG; Windecker S; Lange R; Piazza N
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 64(22):2330-9. PubMed ID: 25465419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and efficacy of minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a new-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.
    Michel JM; Frangieh AH; Giacoppo D; Alvarez-Covarrubias HA; Pellegrini C; Rheude T; Deutsch O; Mayr NP; Rumpf PM; Stähli BE; Kastrati A; Schunkert H; Xhepa E; Joner M; Kasel AM
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 110(12):1993-2006. PubMed ID: 34505192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in stenotic bicuspid aortic valve compared to tricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zghouzi M; Osman H; Ullah W; Suleiman AR; Razvi P; Abdalrazzak M; Rabbat F; Alraiyes M; Sattar Y; Bagur R; Paul T; Matetic A; Mamas MA; Lakkis N; Alraies MC
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Jul; 20(7):581-588. PubMed ID: 35770517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].
    Zhang JQ; Chi CW; Zhao WL; Meng QT; Wang LD; Liu JY; Sun FZ; Zhang SL; Liu JH
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 36517440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement for patients with bicuspid aortic valve: a single-centre experience.
    Coti I; Werner P; Kaider A; Mach M; Kocher A; Laufer G; Andreas M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Sep; 62(4):. PubMed ID: 35076066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Less pronounced reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to tricuspid aortic stenosis.
    Xiong TY; Wang X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Zheng MX; Zhou X; Peng Y; Wei JF; Feng Y; Chen M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 29915878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Valve.
    Sun J; Chen S; Sun C; Qi H; Qian X; Zheng Z
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022; 34(3):854-865. PubMed ID: 34380080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes and the impact of valve morphology for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gupta R; Mahmoudi E; Behnoush AH; Malik AH; Mahajan P; Lin M; Bandyopadhyay D; Goel A; Chakraborty S; Aedma SK; Gupta HB; Vyas AV; Combs WG; Mathur M; Yakubov SJ; Patel NC
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Oct; 102(4):721-730. PubMed ID: 37605512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valves.
    Jin Q; Chen S; Yang X; Li M; Li W; Zhang X; Zhou D; Lam YY; Ge J
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Dec; 22(1):540. PubMed ID: 36503424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of Florida Sleeve Procedure in Patients with Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve.
    Aalaei-Andabili SH; Beaver TM; Martin TD; Hess PJ; Arnaoutakis GJ
    Innovations (Phila); 2020; 15(4):361-368. PubMed ID: 32729751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Valve-sparing root reimplantation and leaflet repair in a bicuspid aortic valve: comparison with the 3-cusp David procedure.
    Bavaria JE; Desai N; Szeto WY; Komlo C; Rhode T; Wallen T; Vallabhajosyula P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Feb; 149(2 Suppl):S22-8. PubMed ID: 25500099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The aortic root does not dilate over time after replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valves.
    Hui SK; Fan CS; Christie S; Feindel CM; David TE; Ouzounian M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jul; 156(1):5-13.e1. PubMed ID: 29656818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed tomography characteristics of the aortic valve and the geometry of SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Kawamori H; Yoon SH; Chakravarty T; Maeno Y; Kashif M; Israr S; Abramowitz Y; Mangat G; Miyasaka M; Rami T; Kazuno Y; Takahashi N; Jilaihawi H; Nakamura M; Cheng W; Friedman J; Berman D; Sharma R; Makkar RR
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1408-1418. PubMed ID: 29315371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve with Aortic Stenosis: a Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.
    Chan JSK; Singh S; Eriksen P; Tsui LH; Harky A
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Mar; 37(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 33355793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.