These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37400892)

  • 1. Outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zuo Y; Tan R; Qin C
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Jul; 18(1):206. PubMed ID: 37400892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bicuspid aortic valve durability with valve-sparing aortic root replacement: comparison to tricuspid valve.
    Levine D; Patel P; Zhao Y; Childress P; Chung M; Leshnower BG; Kurlansky P; Smith CR; Chen EP; Takayama H
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 36702459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Haemodynamic outcome at four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging following valve-sparing aortic root replacement with tricuspid and bicuspid valve morphology.
    Semaan E; Markl M; Malaisrie SC; Barker A; Allen B; McCarthy P; Carr JC; Collins JD
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 May; 45(5):818-25. PubMed ID: 24317086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with stenotic bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kanjanahattakij N; Horn B; Vutthikraivit W; Biso SM; Ziccardi MR; Lu MLR; Rattanawong P
    Clin Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 41(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 29896777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic root replacement with bicuspid valve reimplantation: Are outcomes and valve durability comparable to those of tricuspid valve reimplantation?
    Mokashi SA; Rosinski BF; Desai MY; Griffin BP; Hammer DF; Kalahasti V; Johnston DR; Rajeswaran J; Roselli EE; Blackstone EH; Svensson LG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 163(1):51-63.e5. PubMed ID: 32684389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis with first- and new-generation bioprostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ueshima D; Nai Fovino L; Brener SJ; Fabris T; Scotti A; Barioli A; Giacoppo D; Pavei A; Fraccaro C; Napodano M; Tarantini G
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Jan; 298():76-82. PubMed ID: 31575495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Mylotte D; Lefevre T; Søndergaard L; Watanabe Y; Modine T; Dvir D; Bosmans J; Tchetche D; Kornowski R; Sinning JM; Thériault-Lauzier P; O'Sullivan CJ; Barbanti M; Debry N; Buithieu J; Codner P; Dorfmeister M; Martucci G; Nickenig G; Wenaweser P; Tamburino C; Grube E; Webb JG; Windecker S; Lange R; Piazza N
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 64(22):2330-9. PubMed ID: 25465419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and efficacy of minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a new-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.
    Michel JM; Frangieh AH; Giacoppo D; Alvarez-Covarrubias HA; Pellegrini C; Rheude T; Deutsch O; Mayr NP; Rumpf PM; Stähli BE; Kastrati A; Schunkert H; Xhepa E; Joner M; Kasel AM
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 110(12):1993-2006. PubMed ID: 34505192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in stenotic bicuspid aortic valve compared to tricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zghouzi M; Osman H; Ullah W; Suleiman AR; Razvi P; Abdalrazzak M; Rabbat F; Alraiyes M; Sattar Y; Bagur R; Paul T; Matetic A; Mamas MA; Lakkis N; Alraies MC
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Jul; 20(7):581-588. PubMed ID: 35770517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].
    Zhang JQ; Chi CW; Zhao WL; Meng QT; Wang LD; Liu JY; Sun FZ; Zhang SL; Liu JH
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 36517440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement for patients with bicuspid aortic valve: a single-centre experience.
    Coti I; Werner P; Kaider A; Mach M; Kocher A; Laufer G; Andreas M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Sep; 62(4):. PubMed ID: 35076066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Less pronounced reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to tricuspid aortic stenosis.
    Xiong TY; Wang X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Zheng MX; Zhou X; Peng Y; Wei JF; Feng Y; Chen M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 29915878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ascending Aortic Progression After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients with Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves.
    Zheng HJ; Liu X; Yu SJ; Li J; He P; Cheng W
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Jul; 39(4):e20230438. PubMed ID: 39038201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Valve.
    Sun J; Chen S; Sun C; Qi H; Qian X; Zheng Z
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022; 34(3):854-865. PubMed ID: 34380080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes and the impact of valve morphology for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gupta R; Mahmoudi E; Behnoush AH; Malik AH; Mahajan P; Lin M; Bandyopadhyay D; Goel A; Chakraborty S; Aedma SK; Gupta HB; Vyas AV; Combs WG; Mathur M; Yakubov SJ; Patel NC
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Oct; 102(4):721-730. PubMed ID: 37605512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical outcomes of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valves.
    Jin Q; Chen S; Yang X; Li M; Li W; Zhang X; Zhou D; Lam YY; Ge J
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Dec; 22(1):540. PubMed ID: 36503424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of Florida Sleeve Procedure in Patients with Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve.
    Aalaei-Andabili SH; Beaver TM; Martin TD; Hess PJ; Arnaoutakis GJ
    Innovations (Phila); 2020; 15(4):361-368. PubMed ID: 32729751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Valve-sparing root reimplantation and leaflet repair in a bicuspid aortic valve: comparison with the 3-cusp David procedure.
    Bavaria JE; Desai N; Szeto WY; Komlo C; Rhode T; Wallen T; Vallabhajosyula P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Feb; 149(2 Suppl):S22-8. PubMed ID: 25500099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The aortic root does not dilate over time after replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valves.
    Hui SK; Fan CS; Christie S; Feindel CM; David TE; Ouzounian M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jul; 156(1):5-13.e1. PubMed ID: 29656818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed tomography characteristics of the aortic valve and the geometry of SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Kawamori H; Yoon SH; Chakravarty T; Maeno Y; Kashif M; Israr S; Abramowitz Y; Mangat G; Miyasaka M; Rami T; Kazuno Y; Takahashi N; Jilaihawi H; Nakamura M; Cheng W; Friedman J; Berman D; Sharma R; Makkar RR
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1408-1418. PubMed ID: 29315371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.