133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37401184)
1. Estimating the Irreducible Uncertainty in Visual Diagnosis: Statistical Modeling of Skill Using Response Models.
Pusic MV; Rapkiewicz A; Raykov T; Melamed J
Med Decis Making; 2023 Aug; 43(6):680-691. PubMed ID: 37401184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading.
Flach RN; Egevad L; Eklund M; van der Kwast TH; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Suelmann BBM; Willemse PM; Meijer RP; van Diest PJ
J Clin Pathol; 2023 Dec; 77(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 36328436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling Diagnostic Expertise in Cases of Irreducible Uncertainty: The Decision-Aligned Response Model.
Pusic MV; Cook DA; Friedman JL; Lorin JD; Rosenzweig BP; Tong CKW; Smith S; Lineberry M; Hatala R
Acad Med; 2023 Jan; 98(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 36576770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Cheville J; Comperat E; Evans AJ; Fine SW; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Hörnblad J; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; Magi-Galluzzi C; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; True LD; Tsuzuki T; van der Kwast T; Varma M; Zhou M; Clements M
Histopathology; 2018 Jul; 73(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 29359484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The International Society of Urological Pathology Education web-a web-based system for training and testing of pathologists.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Leite KR; Efremov G; Furusato B; Han M; Jufe L; Tsuzuki T; Wang Z; Hörnblad J; Clements M
Virchows Arch; 2019 May; 474(5):577-584. PubMed ID: 30790058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. WHO/ISUP grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma; validation of grading on the digital pathology platform and perspectives on reproducibility of grade.
Browning L; Colling R; Verrill C
Diagn Pathol; 2021 Aug; 16(1):75. PubMed ID: 34419085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Similarities and Differences in the 2019 ISUP and GUPS Recommendations on Prostate Cancer Grading: A Guide for Practicing Pathologists.
Smith SC; Gandhi JS; Moch H; Aron M; Compérat E; Paner GP; McKenney JK; Amin MB
Adv Anat Pathol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 33027069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Takeshima Y; Yamada Y; Teshima T; Fujimura T; Kakutani S; Hakozaki Y; Kimura N; Akiyama Y; Sato Y; Kawai T; Yamada D; Kume H
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):501. PubMed ID: 33947348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Samaratunga H
APMIS; 2016 Jun; 124(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 27150257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Gianduzzo T; Coughlin G; Duffy D; LeFevre I; Johannsen S; Egevad L; Yaxley J
Pathology; 2015 Oct; 47(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 26325670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice.
Zareba P; Zhang J; Yilmaz A; Trpkov K
Histopathology; 2009 Oct; 55(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19817888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
