These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37401300)

  • 1. The diagnostic accuracy of the IFLIP system for binocular visual function anomalies assessment.
    Wang JY; Chen XR; Peng S; Zhu L
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Jun; 27(12):5620-5626. PubMed ID: 37401300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random Changes of Accommodation Stimuli: An Automated Extension of the Flippers Accommodative Facility Test.
    Otero C; Aldaba M; López S; Díaz-Doutón F; Vera-Díaz FA; Pujol J
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jun; 43(6):788-795. PubMed ID: 29488815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binocular vision anomalies and normative data (BAND) in Tamil Nadu: report 1.
    Hussaindeen JR; Rakshit A; Singh NK; Swaminathan M; George R; Kapur S; Scheiman M; Ramani KK
    Clin Exp Optom; 2017 May; 100(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 27796049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The minimum test battery to screen for binocular vision anomalies: report 3 of the BAND study.
    Hussaindeen JR; Rakshit A; Singh NK; Swaminathan M; George R; Kapur S; Scheiman M; Ramani KK
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):281-287. PubMed ID: 29150866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binocular and Accommodative Characteristics in a Normal Population.
    Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M; Hashemi H; Ostadimoghaddam H; Ghasemi-Moghaddam S; Heravian J; Doostdar A; Nabovati P
    Strabismus; 2017 Mar; 25(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 28095087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of gaming on accommodative and vergence facilities after exposure to virtual reality head-mounted display.
    Munsamy AJ; Paruk H; Gopichunder B; Luggya A; Majola T; Khulu S
    J Optom; 2020; 13(3):163-170. PubMed ID: 32234359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency of convergence and accommodative disorders in a clinical population of Mashhad, Iran.
    Hoseini-Yazdi SH; Yekta A; Nouri H; Heravian J; Ostadimoghaddam H; Khabazkhoob M
    Strabismus; 2015; 23(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 25789965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing dynamic defocus curve for evaluating dynamic vision accommodative function.
    Wu T; Wang Y; Wei S; Guo Y; Li X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 22(1):106. PubMed ID: 35248018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of indigenously developed computer-based binocular vision assessment.
    Kumar PP; Shajahan T; Hussaindeen JR
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 35937733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accommodation and binocular vision changes after wearing orthokeratology lens in 8- to 14-year-old myopic children.
    Song Y; Zhu S; Yang B; Wang X; Ma W; Dong G; Liu L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 259(7):2035-2045. PubMed ID: 33528648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-retest reproducibility of accommodative facility measures in primary school children.
    Adler P; Scally AJ; Barrett BT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Nov; 101(6):764-770. PubMed ID: 29740867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining the Validity of a New Method for the Objective Assessment of Binocular Accommodative Facility (2Q-AF Test): A Comparison with ± 2.00 DS Lens Flippers.
    Vera J; Redondo B; Koulieris GA; Molina R; Jiménez R
    Curr Eye Res; 2022 Jan; 47(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 34612106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of contact lenses with different optical designs on the binocular vision and visual behavior of young adults.
    Chen ST; Tung HC; Chen YT; Tien CL; Yeh CW; Lian JS; Cheng CY
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6573. PubMed ID: 35449200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of manipulating the vergence/accommodation and image size mismatches of the ±2D flipper test on the frequency and precision of accommodative facility.
    Vera J; Redondo B; Martínez-Tovar JM; Molina R; Koulieris GA; Allen PM; Jiménez R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Jul; 43(4):660-667. PubMed ID: 37002939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accommodation and stereopsis in adults with traumatic brain injury.
    Chen N; Liao M; Yang C; Liu L
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Nov; 103(6):877-884. PubMed ID: 32166808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accommodative and binocular vision dysfunctions in a Portuguese clinical population.
    Franco S; Moreira A; Fernandes A; Baptista A
    J Optom; 2022; 15(4):271-277. PubMed ID: 34852966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of orthokeratology lens wear on binocular vision and accommodation: A short-term prospective study.
    Kang P; Watt K; Chau T; Zhu J; Evans BJW; Swarbrick H
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Dec; 41(6):501-506. PubMed ID: 30224265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Normative Data for Parameters of Accommodation in African Schoolchildren.
    Darko-Takyi C; Moodley VR; Boadi-Kusi SB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Mar; 99(3):259-266. PubMed ID: 34897237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical testing of accommodative facility: part III. Masked assessment of the relation between visual symptoms and binocular test results in school children and adults.
    Wick B; Gall R; Yothers T
    Optometry; 2002 Mar; 73(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 12365701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the clinical testing of accommodative facility.
    Kedzia B; Pieczyrak D; Tondel G; Maples WC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Jan; 19(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 10615434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.