These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37401576)

  • 21. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim IC; Yoon HJ; Shin ES; Kim MS; Park J; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Nam CW; Han SW; Kim YN; Kim KB; Hur SH
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial): Results From the OPINION Imaging Study.
    Otake H; Kubo T; Takahashi H; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Kozuma K; Ioji T; Kaneda H; Akasaka T;
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 11(1):111-123. PubMed ID: 28917678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Trends and Outcomes 2010-2019.
    Machanahalli Balakrishna A; Ismayl M; Walters RW; Aboeata A; Gowda RM; Vallabhajosyula S; Goldsweig AM; Dahal K
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 47(9):101270. PubMed ID: 35640848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optical coherence tomography is a kid on the block: I would choose intravascular ultrasound.
    Dash D
    Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(3):407-410. PubMed ID: 28648442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Frequency and prognostic impact of intravascular imaging-guided urgent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from J-MINUET.
    Okura H; Saito Y; Soeda T; Nakao K; Ozaki Y; Kimura K; Ako J; Noguchi T; Yasuda S; Suwa S; Fujimoto K; Nakama Y; Morita T; Shimizu W; Hirohata A; Morita Y; Inoue T; Okamura A; Uematsu M; Hirata K; Tanabe K; Shibata Y; Owa M; Tsujita K; Nishimura K; Miyamoto Y; Ishihara M;
    Heart Vessels; 2019 Apr; 34(4):564-571. PubMed ID: 30390126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Real-world use of intravascular ultrasound in Japan: a report from contemporary multicenter PCI registry.
    Kuno T; Numasawa Y; Sawano M; Abe T; Ueda I; Kodaira M; Suzuki M; Noma S; Nakamura I; Negishi K; Ishikawa S; Fukuda K; Kohsaka S
    Heart Vessels; 2019 Nov; 34(11):1728-1739. PubMed ID: 31129872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of IVUS and OCT on physician decision-making during post-PCI optimization.
    Bhogal S; Hashim H; Merdler I; Aladin AI; Zhang C; Ben-Dor I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Mintz GS; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():96-98. PubMed ID: 37394321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Outcomes With Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography Guidance in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Arora S; Jaswaney R; Khawaja T; Jain A; Khan SU; Gidwani UK; Osman MN; Goel S; Shah AR; Kleiman NS
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 207():470-478. PubMed ID: 37844404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Siddiqi TJ; Khan MS; Karimi Galougahi K; Shlofmitz E; Moses JW; Rao S; West NEJ; Wolff E; Hochler J; Chau K; Khalique O; Shlofmitz RA; Jeremias A; Ali ZA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 100 Suppl 1():S44-S56. PubMed ID: 36251325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Practical Application.
    Ali ZA; Karimi Galougahi K; Thomas SV; Abu-Much A; Chau K; Dakroub A; Shlofmitz ES; Jeremias A; West N; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Maehara A; Shlofmitz RA
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2023 Apr; 12(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 36922062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Practical Approach to Assessing Stent Results with IVUS or OCT.
    Hachinohe D; Mitomo S; Candilio L; Latib A
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2018; 14(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 29623170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optical coherence tomography-versus intravascular ultrasound-guided stent expansion in calcified lesions.
    Kurogi K; Ishii M; Ikebe S; Kaichi R; Mori T; Komaki S; Yamamoto N; Yamanaga K; Arima Y; Yamamoto E; Kaikita K; Matsushita K; Tsujita K
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2022 Apr; 37(2):312-323. PubMed ID: 34097228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcomes of intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography guided percutaneous coronary angiography: A meta regression-based analysis.
    Sattar Y; Abdul Razzack A; Kompella R; Alhajri N; Arshad J; Ullah W; Zghouzi M; Mir T; Power D; Qureshi WT; Aljaroudi W; Elgendy IY; Mamas MA; Alraies MC
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 34668640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Outcomes of optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation: one-year results from the ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI trial.
    Ali ZA; Karimi Galougahi K; Maehara A; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Guagliumi G; Alfonso F; Akasaka T; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Zhang Z; Rapoza RR; West NEJ; Stone GW
    EuroIntervention; 2021 Jan; 16(13):1085-1091. PubMed ID: 32540793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A multi-center, international, randomized, 2-year, parallel-group study to assess the superiority of IVUS-guided PCI versus qualitative angio-guided PCI in unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease: Study protocol for OPTIMAL trial.
    De Maria GL; Testa L; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Terentes-Printzios D; Emfietzoglou M; Scarsini R; Bedogni F; Spitzer E; Banning A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0260770. PubMed ID: 34995276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vivo coronary lesion differentiation with computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound as compared to optical coherence tomography.
    Wieringa WG; Lexis CP; Lipsic E; van der Werf HW; Burgerhof JG; Hagens VE; Bartels GL; Broersen A; Schurer RA; Tan ES; van der Harst P; van den Heuvel AF; Willems TP; Pundziute G
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 28169175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical utility and significance of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in guiding percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Hibi K; Kimura K; Umemura S
    Circ J; 2015; 79(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 25744628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reciprocal assistance of intravascular imaging in three-dimensional stent reconstruction: Using cross-modal translation based on disentanglement representation.
    Wu P; Qiao Y; Chu M; Zhang S; Bai J; Gutierrez-Chico JL; Tu S
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2023 Mar; 104():102166. PubMed ID: 36586195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence and Clinical Trials.
    Otake H
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2023 Apr; 12(2):225-236. PubMed ID: 36922063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.