These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3740198)

  • 1. Reliability and accuracy of visually analyzing graphed data from single-subject designs.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Am J Occup Ther; 1986 Jul; 40(7):464-9. PubMed ID: 3740198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual inspection of single-subject data: an empirical analysis.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Ment Retard; 1990 Oct; 28(5):283-90. PubMed ID: 2147734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical investigation of visual-inspection versus trend-line analysis of single-subject data.
    Hojem MA; Ottenbacher KJ
    Phys Ther; 1988 Jun; 68(6):983-8. PubMed ID: 3375323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of visual inspection and statistical analysis of single-subject data in rehabilitation research.
    Bobrovitz CD; Ottenbacher KJ
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1998; 77(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 9558008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of autocorrelation on the results of visually analyzing data from single-subject designs.
    Bengali MK; Ottenbacher KJ
    Am J Occup Ther; 1998 Sep; 52(8):650-5. PubMed ID: 9739399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trend line influence on visual analysis of single-subject data in rehabilitation research.
    Johnson MB; Ottenbacher KJ
    Int Disabil Stud; 1991; 13(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 1757405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interrater reliability of therapists' judgements of graphed data.
    Harbst KB; Ottenbacher KJ; Harris SR
    Phys Ther; 1991 Feb; 71(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 1989006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The statistical analysis of single-subject data: a comparative examination.
    Nourbakhsh MR; Ottenbacher KJ
    Phys Ther; 1994 Aug; 74(8):768-76. PubMed ID: 8047564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey evaluation of the reliability of visual inspection and functional analysis graphs.
    Danov SE; Symons FJ
    Behav Modif; 2008 Nov; 32(6):828-39. PubMed ID: 18490266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using a single-subject research design to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment.
    Campbell PH
    Am J Occup Ther; 1988 Nov; 42(11):732-8. PubMed ID: 3218666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of computers in occupational therapy for visual-scanning training.
    Ross FL
    Am J Occup Ther; 1992 Apr; 46(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 1566798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interrater agreement of visual analysis in single-subject decisions: quantitative review and analysis.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Am J Ment Retard; 1993 Jul; 98(1):135-42. PubMed ID: 8373565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting results of single-subject research designs.
    Wolery M; Harris SR
    Phys Ther; 1982 Apr; 62(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 7063536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategies for evaluating clinical change: implications for practice and research.
    Ottenbacher K; York J
    Am J Occup Ther; 1984 Oct; 38(10):647-59. PubMed ID: 6388340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of an in-vivo metric to aid visual inspection of single-case design data: Do we need to run more sessions?
    Barnard-Brak L; Richman DM; Little TD; Yang Z
    Behav Res Ther; 2018 Mar; 102():8-15. PubMed ID: 29277023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of data in idiographic research. Issues and methods.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Aug; 71(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 1642819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the agreement between the conservative dual-criterion method and expert visual analysis.
    Wolfe K; Seaman MA; Drasgow E; Sherlock P
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Apr; 51(2):345-351. PubMed ID: 29574711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choosing among techniques for quantifying single-case intervention effectiveness.
    Manolov R; Solanas A; Sierra V; Evans JJ
    Behav Ther; 2011 Sep; 42(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 21658534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting visual inference in single-case designs.
    Ximenes VM; Manolov R; Solanas A; Quera V
    Span J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 12(2):823-32. PubMed ID: 19899683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interrater Agreement on the Visual Analysis of Individual Tiers and Functional Relations in Multiple Baseline Designs.
    Wolfe K; Seaman MA; Drasgow E
    Behav Modif; 2016 Nov; 40(6):852-873. PubMed ID: 27103183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.