BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37402832)

  • 1. The significance of metabolic response to neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy detected with [
    Onal C; Guler OC; Torun N; Oymak E; Reyhan M
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Oct; 50(12):3755-3764. PubMed ID: 37402832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective correlation of
    Onal C; Torun N; Oymak E; Guler OC; Reyhan M; Yapar AF
    Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Jun; 34(6):388-396. PubMed ID: 32221791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection Efficacy of Hybrid
    Einspieler I; Rauscher I; Düwel C; Krönke M; Rischpler C; Habl G; Dewes S; Ott A; Wester HJ; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 58(7):1081-1087. PubMed ID: 28209912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of androgen deprivation therapy on
    Onal C; Guler OC; Torun N; Reyhan M; Yapar AF
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Mar; 47(3):632-641. PubMed ID: 31732768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinicopathological predictors of positive
    Aydin AM; Haberal B; Artykov M; Bilen CY; Yazici S
    Ann Nucl Med; 2019 May; 33(5):326-332. PubMed ID: 30778860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical parameters and nomograms for predicting lymph node metastasis detected with
    Onal C; Ozyigit G; Oymak E; Guler OC; Hurmuz P; Tilki B; Reyhan M; Tuncel M; Akyol F
    Prostate; 2021 Jul; 81(10):648-656. PubMed ID: 33949694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Association Between [
    Chen M; Fu Y; Peng S; Zang S; Ai S; Zhuang J; Wang F; Qiu X; Guo H
    J Nucl Med; 2023 Oct; 64(10):1550-1555. PubMed ID: 37474268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy, Predictive Factors, and Prediction Nomograms for
    Rauscher I; Düwel C; Haller B; Rischpler C; Heck MM; Gschwend JE; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):656-661. PubMed ID: 29358059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10.
    Akdemir EN; Tuncel M; Akyol F; Bilen CY; Baydar DE; Karabulut E; Ozen H; Caglar M
    World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):813-821. PubMed ID: 30151600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial experience of Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in evaluation of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients.
    Natarajan A; Agrawal A; Murthy V; Bakshi G; Joshi A; Purandare N; Shah S; Puranik A; Rangarajan V
    World J Nucl Med; 2019; 18(3):244-250. PubMed ID: 31516367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome after PSMA-PET/CT-based salvage radiotherapy for nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Rogowski P; Trapp C; von Bestenbostel R; Eze C; Ganswindt U; Li M; Unterrainer M; Zacherl MJ; Ilhan H; Beyer L; Kretschmer A; Bartenstein P; Stief C; Belka C; Schmidt-Hegemann NS
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Mar; 49(4):1417-1428. PubMed ID: 34628521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection level and pattern of positive lesions using PSMA PET/CT for staging prior to radiation therapy.
    Schmidt-Hegemann NS; Fendler WP; Buchner A; Stief C; Rogowski P; Niyazi M; Eze C; Li M; Bartenstein P; Belka C; Ganswindt U
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):176. PubMed ID: 29126446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk Factors for Biochemical Recurrence After PSMA-PET-Guided Definitive Radiotherapy in Patients With
    Spohn SKB; Birkenmaier V; Ruf J; Mix M; Sigle A; Haehl E; Adebahr S; Sprave T; Gkika E; Rühle A; Nicolay NH; Kirste S; Grosu AL; Zamboglou C
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():898774. PubMed ID: 35747822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Head-to-head comparisons of [
    Ke ZB; Chen SM; Chen JY; Chen SH; You Q; Sun JB; Xue YT; Sun XL; Wu XH; Zheng QS; Wei Y; Xue XY; Xu N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Mar; 50(4):1240-1251. PubMed ID: 36416906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    Artigas C; Flamen P; Charlier F; Levillain H; Wimana Z; Diamand R; Albisinni S; Gil T; Velthoven RV; Peltier A; Gestel DV; Roumeguere T; Otte FX
    World J Urol; 2019 Aug; 37(8):1535-1542. PubMed ID: 30824985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    Ceci F; Castellucci P; Graziani T; Farolfi A; Fonti C; Lodi F; Fanti S
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jan; 46(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 30350010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    Farolfi A; Ceci F; Castellucci P; Graziani T; Siepe G; Lambertini A; Schiavina R; Lodi F; Morganti AG; Fanti S
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jan; 46(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 29905907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    Haidar M; Abi-Ghanem AS; Moukaddam H; Jebai ME; Al Zakleet S; Al Rayess S; Akkawi AR; Kassas M; Tamim H; Hajj AE; Estrada-Lobato E; Osman MM; Shamseddine A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20500. PubMed ID: 36443430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How accurate is
    Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.