These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37403084)

  • 21. Comparison of robotic-assisted resection alone and with natural orifice specimen extraction for rectal cancer by using Da Vinci Xi.
    Aslaner A; Çakır T; Eyvaz K; Kazım Kazan M; Can Çakır R; Doğan U; Rıza Gündüz U
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Sep; 26(18):6665-6670. PubMed ID: 36196717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study.
    Zhang H; Hu H; Huang R; Guan Z; Zheng M; Xu C; Li Z; Wang Y; Zhang W; Yu L; Jin Y; Tang Q; Wang G; Wang X
    Updates Surg; 2022 Apr; 74(2):599-607. PubMed ID: 34370279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Short- and long-term outcomes as well as anal function of transanal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer resection: a retrospective study with over 5-year follow-up.
    Zhang J; Li W; Li Y; Amin B; Zhang N; Sun Z; Zhu B
    Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2022 Jun; 17(2):344-351. PubMed ID: 35707343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Short-term and long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgeries (NOSES) in rectal cancer: a comparison study of NOSES and non-NOSES.
    Zhang Q; Wang M; Ma D; Zhang W; Wu H; Zhong Y; Zheng C; Ju H; Wang G
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Apr; 10(8):488. PubMed ID: 35571383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
    Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional robotic colorectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching study.
    Huang Y; Yu N
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):175. PubMed ID: 38619667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Multicenter Study Evaluating Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
    Liu Z; Efetov S; Guan X; Zhou H; Tulina I; Wang G; Tsarkov P; Wang X;
    J Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 243():236-241. PubMed ID: 31229790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-Term Outcome Comparison Between Two Specimen Extraction Approaches for Middle Rectum Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
    Zhong Y; Qiao T; Ma T; Hu H; Jin Y; Wang Y; Tang Q; Huang R; Wang G; Wang X
    Surg Innov; 2021 Dec; 28(6):738-746. PubMed ID: 33787417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone versus robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction: a matched analysis.
    Liu D; Luo R; Wan Z; Zhu W; He P; Ye S; Tang C; Lei X; Li T
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12848. PubMed ID: 32733103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional robotic resection for patients with colorectal neoplasms.
    Li L; Liu K; Li T; Zhou J; Xu S; Yu N; Guo Z; Yao H
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1153751. PubMed ID: 37007091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative short- and long-term outcomes of three techniques of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for rectal cancer.
    Guan X; Lu Z; Wang S; Liu E; Zhao Z; Chen H; Zhang M; Hu X; Muhammad S; Ma C; Ma X; Huang H; Jiang Z; Liu Z; Wang G; Wang X
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e55-e61. PubMed ID: 32782201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Xu SZ; Wang ZF; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SB; Yan F; Liu GY; Cai JC
    Int J Surg; 2024 Mar; 110(3):1402-1410. PubMed ID: 38484259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study.
    Ielpo B; Caruso R; Quijano Y; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Oliva C; Olivares S; Ferri V; Ceron R; Plaza C; Vicente E
    Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24692203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.
    Gorgun E; Ozben V; Costedio M; Stocchi L; Kalady M; Remzi F
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1063-1071. PubMed ID: 27154266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. No beneficial effect on survival but a decrease in postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer undergoing robotic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
    Lei X; Yang L; Huang Z; Shi H; Zhou Z; Tang C; Li T
    BMC Surg; 2021 Sep; 21(1):355. PubMed ID: 34583670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Aug; 46(8):957-62. PubMed ID: 26482845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with partial preservation of Denonvilliers fascia: a comparative study of short-term efficacy and urinary and erectile function].
    Huang ZK; Chi P; Huang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 24(4):327-334. PubMed ID: 33878822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.