178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37403155)
1. TB-IECS: an accurate machine learning-based scoring function for virtual screening.
Zhang X; Shen C; Jiang D; Zhang J; Ye Q; Xu L; Hou T; Pan P; Kang Y
J Cheminform; 2023 Jul; 15(1):63. PubMed ID: 37403155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy or novelty: what can we gain from target-specific machine-learning-based scoring functions in virtual screening?
Shen C; Weng G; Zhang X; Leung EL; Yao X; Pang J; Chai X; Li D; Wang E; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33418562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. TocoDecoy: A New Approach to Design Unbiased Datasets for Training and Benchmarking Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
Zhang X; Shen C; Liao B; Jiang D; Wang J; Wu Z; Du H; Wang T; Huo W; Xu L; Cao D; Hsieh CY; Hou T
J Med Chem; 2022 Jun; 65(11):7918-7932. PubMed ID: 35642777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beware of the generic machine learning-based scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.
Shen C; Hu Y; Wang Z; Zhang X; Pang J; Wang G; Zhong H; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32484221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ML-PLIC: a web platform for characterizing protein-ligand interactions and developing machine learning-based scoring functions.
Zhang X; Shen C; Wang T; Deng Y; Kang Y; Li D; Hou T; Pan P
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Sep; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 37738401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving structure-based virtual screening performance via learning from scoring function components.
Xiong GL; Ye WL; Shen C; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32496540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can machine learning consistently improve the scoring power of classical scoring functions? Insights into the role of machine learning in scoring functions.
Shen C; Hu Y; Wang Z; Zhang X; Zhong H; Wang G; Yao X; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jan; 22(1):497-514. PubMed ID: 31982914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening Ability by Integrating Multiple Energy Auxiliary Terms from Molecular Docking Scoring.
Ye WL; Shen C; Xiong GL; Ding JJ; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4216-4230. PubMed ID: 32352294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine learning on ligand-residue interaction profiles to significantly improve binding affinity prediction.
Ji B; He X; Zhai J; Zhang Y; Man VH; Wang J
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33758923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ASFP (Artificial Intelligence based Scoring Function Platform): a web server for the development of customized scoring functions.
Zhang X; Shen C; Guo X; Wang Z; Weng G; Ye Q; Wang G; He Q; Yang B; Cao D; Hou T
J Cheminform; 2021 Feb; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 33541407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classical scoring functions for docking are unable to exploit large volumes of structural and interaction data.
Li H; Peng J; Sidorov P; Leung Y; Leung KS; Wong MH; Lu G; Ballester PJ
Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(20):3989-3995. PubMed ID: 30873528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine-learning scoring functions to improve structure-based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening.
Ain QU; Aleksandrova A; Roessler FD; Ballester PJ
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci; 2015; 5(6):405-424. PubMed ID: 27110292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Topology-Based and Conformation-Based Decoys Database: An Unbiased Online Database for Training and Benchmarking Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
Zhang X; Shen C; Wang T; Kang Y; Li D; Pan P; Wang J; Wang G; Deng Y; Xu L; Cao D; Hou T; Wang Z
J Med Chem; 2023 Jul; 66(13):9174-9183. PubMed ID: 37317043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Docking Score ML: Target-Specific Machine Learning Models Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening in 155 Targets.
Liu H; Hu B; Chen P; Wang X; Wang H; Wang S; Wang J; Lin B; Cheng M
J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38958413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delta Machine Learning to Improve Scoring-Ranking-Screening Performances of Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions.
Yang C; Zhang Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jun; 62(11):2696-2712. PubMed ID: 35579568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MILCDock: Machine Learning Enhanced Consensus Docking for Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
Morris CJ; Stern JA; Stark B; Christopherson M; Della Corte D
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5342-5350. PubMed ID: 36342217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. LIT-PCBA: An Unbiased Data Set for Machine Learning and Virtual Screening.
Tran-Nguyen VK; Jacquemard C; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4263-4273. PubMed ID: 32282202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
