194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37403169)
1. Marginal gap and internal fit of 3D printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns.
Refaie A; Fouda A; Bourauel C; Singer L
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):448. PubMed ID: 37403169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fit, Precision, and Trueness of 3D-Printed Zirconia Crowns Compared to Milled Counterparts.
Abualsaud R; Alalawi H
Dent J (Basel); 2022 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 36421402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D-printed versus conventionally milled zirconia for dental clinical applications: Trueness, precision, accuracy, biological and esthetic aspects.
Alghauli M; Alqutaibi AY; Wille S; Kern M
J Dent; 2024 May; 144():104925. PubMed ID: 38471580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fit and accuracy of single crowns fabricated from self-glazed zirconia compared with milled zirconia.
Marouki C; Shamon A; Svanborg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1105-1110. PubMed ID: 36959004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of modifying occlusal cement spacer on the fit accuracy of digitally manufactured zirconia crowns.
Ibrahim H; El Kateb M; Morsy N
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):93.e1-93.e6. PubMed ID: 37867014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of ultrathin occlusal veneers made of 3D-printed zirconia, milled zirconia, and heat-pressed lithium disilicate.
Ioannidis A; Park JM; Hüsler J; Bomze D; Mühlemann S; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 33741143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional fit of self-glazed zirconia monolithic crowns fabricated by wet deposition.
Li Y; Zhao J; Sun Z; Lin N; Zheng Y
Dent Mater J; 2022 May; 41(3):363-367. PubMed ID: 35095041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D-printing technique.
Hasanzade M; Yaghoobi N; Nematollahi P; Ghazanfari R
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2023 Oct; 9(5):832-839. PubMed ID: 37386767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Accuracy of Fit of Crowns Made From Wax Patterns Produced Conventionally (Hand Formed) and Via CAD/CAM Technology.
Fathi HM; Al-Masoody AH; El-Ghezawi N; Johnson A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Mar; 24(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 27039473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of sintering time on the marginal and internal fit of monolithic zirconia crowns containing 3-4 mol% Y
Ozden YE; Guncu MB; Aktas G; Canay S
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):493. PubMed ID: 36380324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fit of anterior restorations made of 3D-printed and milled zirconia: An in-vitro study.
Rues S; Zehender N; Zenthöfer A; Bömicke W; Herpel C; Ilani A; Erber R; Roser C; Lux CJ; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104415. PubMed ID: 36640843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal fit of monolithic versus layered zirconia crowns assessed with 2 marginal gap methods.
Fasih P; Tavakolizadeh S; Sedaghat Monfared M; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Yari A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):250.e1-250.e7. PubMed ID: 37451899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study.
Lerner H; Nagy K; Pranno N; Zarone F; Admakin O; Mangano F
J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103792. PubMed ID: 34481929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internal and marginal discrepancies associated with stereolithography (SLA) additively manufactured zirconia crowns.
Revilla-León M; Methani MM; Morton D; Zandinejad A
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):730-737. PubMed ID: 31980204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptation and uniformity of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by additive 3-dimensional gel deposition.
Sun Z; Shen Z; Zhao J; Zheng Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):859-865. PubMed ID: 35135676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of partially crystallized versus fully crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate CAD-CAM crowns: An in vitro comparison of the silicone replica technique, direct view, and 3-dimensional superimposition analysis.
El-Ashkar A; Taymour M; El-Tannir A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):769-776. PubMed ID: 34479719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns using Different Measurement Techniques.
Peng CC; Chung KH; Ramos V
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 31702087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
