These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37406529)

  • 1. Socio-demographic and cultural factors related to non-participation in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme.
    van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; de Jonge L; van Vuuren AJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW; Ramakers CRB; Nagtegaal ID; van Kemenade FJ; van Leerdam ME; Toes-Zoutendijk E
    Eur J Cancer; 2023 Sep; 190():112942. PubMed ID: 37406529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Socioeconomic position and participation in colorectal cancer screening.
    Frederiksen BL; Jørgensen T; Brasso K; Holten I; Osler M
    Br J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 103(10):1496-501. PubMed ID: 20959827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Socioeconomic differences in participation and diagnostic yield within the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening programme with faecal immunochemical testing.
    van der Meulen MP; Toes-Zoutendijk E; Spaander MCW; Dekker E; Bonfrer JMG; van Vuuren AJ; Kuipers EJ; van Kemenade FJ; van Velthuysen MF; Thomeer MGJ; van Veldhuizen H; de Koning HJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Leerdam ME
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0264067. PubMed ID: 35176116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing income-related inequities in colorectal cancer screening: lessons learned from a retrospective analysis of organised programme and non-programme screening delivery in Winnipeg, Manitoba.
    Decker KM; Demers AA; Nugent Z; Biswanger N; Singh H
    BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e009470. PubMed ID: 26908517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential effects of colorectal cancer screening across sociodemographic groups in Denmark: a register-based study.
    Pallesen AVJ; Herrstedt J; Westendorp RGJ; Mortensen LH; Kristiansen M
    Acta Oncol; 2021 Mar; 60(3):323-332. PubMed ID: 33427545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
    Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in diagnostic activity in general practice and findings for individuals invited to the danish screening programme for colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study.
    Juul JS; Andersen B; Laurberg S; Carlsen AH; Olesen F; Vedsted P
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Sep; 36(3):281-290. PubMed ID: 29929415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of comorbid conditions on participation in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme: a cross-sectional study.
    Guiriguet C; Pera G; Castells A; Toran P; Grau J; Rivero I; Buron A; Macià F; Vela-Vallespín C; Vilarrubí-Estrella M; Marzo-Castillejo M
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(1):524. PubMed ID: 28784093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme reach equity in FIT uptake?
    Hoeck S; van de Veerdonk W; De Brabander I; Kellen E
    Eur J Public Health; 2019 Dec; 29(6):1108-1114. PubMed ID: 30887054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colorectal cancer screening participation among citizens not recommended to be screened: a cohort study.
    Larsen PT; Jørgensen SF; Njor SH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 22(1):256. PubMed ID: 35596148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study.
    Schreuders EH; Grobbee EJ; Nieuwenburg SAV; Kapidzic A; van Roon AHC; van Vuuren AJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spijker WWJ; Izelaar K; Bruno MJ; Kuipers EJ; Spaander MCW
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Aug; 4(8):622-631. PubMed ID: 31196734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, tumour characteristics, and treatment before and after introduction of the faecal immunochemical testing-based screening programme in the Netherlands: a population-based study.
    Breekveldt ECH; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Toes-Zoutendijk E; Spaander MCW; van Vuuren AJ; van Kemenade FJ; Ramakers CRB; Dekker E; Nagtegaal ID; Krul MF; Kok NFM; Kuhlmann KFD; Vink GR; van Leerdam ME; Elferink MAG;
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Jan; 7(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 34822762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The second round of the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program: Impact of an increased fecal immunochemical test cut-off level on yield of screening.
    Kooyker AI; Toes-Zoutendijk E; Opstal-van Winden AWJ; Spaander MCW; Buskermolen M; van Vuuren HJ; Kuipers EJ; van Kemenade FJ; Ramakers C; Thomeer MGJ; Dekker E; Nagtegaal ID; de Koning HJ; van Leerdam ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
    Int J Cancer; 2020 Aug; 147(4):1098-1106. PubMed ID: 31853977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are anxiety levels associated with the decision to participate in a Swedish colorectal cancer screening programme? A nationwide cross-sectional study.
    Wangmar J; von Vogelsang AC; Hultcrantz R; Fritzell K; Wengström Y; Jervaeus A
    BMJ Open; 2018 Dec; 8(12):e025109. PubMed ID: 30580275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing knowledge and attitudes towards screening among users of Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT).
    Denters MJ; Deutekom M; Essink-Bot ML; Bossuyt PM; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):839-49. PubMed ID: 23432931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sociodemographic features and patterns of non-participation in colorectal cancer screening in Finland.
    Jäntti M; Heinävaara S; Malila N; Sarkeala T
    Eur J Public Health; 2021 Oct; 31(4):890-894. PubMed ID: 34347069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.
    Warren Andersen S; Blot WJ; Lipworth L; Steinwandel M; Murff HJ; Zheng W
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Dec; 2(12):e1917995. PubMed ID: 31860105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. To do or not to do - a survey study on factors associated with participating in the Danish screening program for colorectal cancer.
    Nielsen JB; Berg-Beckhoff G; Leppin A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):43. PubMed ID: 33413310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Factors Influence Non-Participation Most in Colorectal Cancer Screening? A Discrete Choice Experiment.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Donkers B; Veldwijk J; Jonker MF; Buis S; Huisman J; Bindels P
    Patient; 2021 Mar; 14(2):269-281. PubMed ID: 33150461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.
    van der Vlugt M; Grobbee EJ; Bossuyt PMM; Bos A; Bongers E; Spijker W; Kuipers EJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Aug; 153(2):439-447.e2. PubMed ID: 28483499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.