These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37407798)

  • 21. Pupillary Stroop effects.
    Laeng B; Ørbo M; Holmlund T; Miozzo M
    Cogn Process; 2011 Feb; 12(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 20865297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects.
    Hutchison KA; Bugg JM; Lim YB; Olsen MR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1087-103. PubMed ID: 26860710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Expectancy-Based Strategic Processes Are Influenced by Spatial Working Memory Load and Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity.
    Ortells JJ; De Fockert JW; Romera N; Fernández S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1239. PubMed ID: 30065693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):284-295. PubMed ID: 27915364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Working memory capacity, controlled attention and aiming performance under pressure.
    Wood G; Vine SJ; Wilson MR
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):510-7. PubMed ID: 26021749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of awareness and secondary task demands on Stroop performance in the pre-cued lists paradigm.
    Bugg JM; Diede NT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():26-35. PubMed ID: 28061943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fluctuations in pre-trial attentional state and their influence on goal neglect.
    Unsworth N; McMillan BD
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 May; 26():90-6. PubMed ID: 24681244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load.
    Kalanthroff E; Avnit A; Henik A; Davelaar EJ; Usher M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):869-75. PubMed ID: 25257710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Working memory load dissociates contingency learning and item-specific proportion-congruent effects.
    Spinelli G; Krishna K; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2007-2033. PubMed ID: 32658541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Individual differences in lapses of sustained attention: Ocolumetric indicators of intrinsic alertness.
    Unsworth N; Miller AL; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jun; 46(6):569-592. PubMed ID: 32162966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict.
    van den Berg B; Krebs RM; Lorist MM; Woldorff MG
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 14(2):561-77. PubMed ID: 24820263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: the role of onset versus offset cues.
    Luo C; Lupiáñez J; Fu X; Weng X
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 19693533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Time-frequency analysis of the event-related potentials associated with the Stroop test.
    Ergen M; Saban S; Kirmizi-Alsan E; Uslu A; Keskin-Ergen Y; Demiralp T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):463-72. PubMed ID: 25135670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When global and local information about attentional demands collide: evidence for global dominance.
    Suh J; Ileri-Tayar M; Bugg JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1858-1873. PubMed ID: 35701660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of concurrent working memory load on distractor and conflict processing in a name-face Stroop task.
    Jongen EM; Jonkman LM
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jan; 48(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 20525010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dynamic adjustments of attentional control in healthy aging.
    Aschenbrenner AJ; Balota DA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Feb; 32(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 28182494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.
    Kane MJ; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Mar; 132(1):47-70. PubMed ID: 12656297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Active inhibition of a distractor word: the distractor precue benefit in the Stroop color-naming task.
    Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):799-812. PubMed ID: 21480743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.