These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37407851)

  • 1. Is the presence of foraminal stenosis associated with outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with posterior microsurgical decompression.
    Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Aug; 165(8):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 37407851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The association between preoperative MRI findings and clinical improvement in patients included in the NORDSTEN spinal stenosis trial.
    Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2777-2785. PubMed ID: 35930062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: baseline data from the NORDSTEN study.
    Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Brox JI; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1391-1398. PubMed ID: 34797405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from decompression of levels with adjacent moderate stenosis? A prospective cohort study from the NORDSTEN study.
    Tronstad S; Haug KJ; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Franssen E; Indrekvam K; Solberg T; Hermansen E
    Spine J; 2024 Jun; 24(6):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 38266826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The association between lumbar lordosis preoperatively and changes in PROMs for lumbar spinal stenosis patients 2 years after spinal surgery: radiological and clinical results from the NORDSTEN-spinal stenosis trial.
    Wänman J; Åkerstedt J; Banitalebi H; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Storheim K; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Indrekvam K; Brisby H; Hermansen E
    Eur Spine J; 2024 May; 33(5):1950-1956. PubMed ID: 38386059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic and clinical outcome of lateral lumbar interbody fusion for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D: a retrospective study.
    Li J; Li H; Zhang N; Wang ZW; Zhao TF; Chen LW; Chen G; Chen QX; Li FC
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Apr; 21(1):259. PubMed ID: 32312254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 3 Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg TK; Furunes H; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e224291. PubMed ID: 35344046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and radiographic performance of indirect foraminal decompression with anterior retroperitoneal lumbar approach for interbody fusion (ALIF).
    Cofano F; Langella F; Petrone S; Baroncini A; Cecchinato R; Redaelli A; Garbossa D; Berjano P
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 209():106946. PubMed ID: 34555799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between Preoperative MRI Parameters and Oswestry Disability Index in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.
    Caprariu R; Oprea MD; Poenaru DV; Andrei D
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Nov; 59(11):. PubMed ID: 38004049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System?
    Kulkarni AG; Das S; Kunder TS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 31633587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiation of pain-related functional limitations in surgical patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using the Oswestry Disability Index: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) study.
    Charalampidis A; Canizares M; Kalsi PS; Hung Wu P; Johnson M; Soroceanu A; Nataraj A; Glennie A; Rasoulinejad P; Attabib N; Hall H; Fisher C; Thomas K; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):578-586. PubMed ID: 34699999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles assessed by MRI is associated with less improvement of leg pain 2 years after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Banitalebi H; Hermansen E; Hellum C; Espeland A; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Indrekvam K; Brisby H; Weber C; Anvar M; Aaen J; Negård A
    Eur Spine J; 2024 May; 33(5):1967-1978. PubMed ID: 38528161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Percutaneous transforaminal full endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Xie P; Feng F; Chen Z; He L; Yang B; Chen R; Wu W; Liu B; Dong J; Shu T; Zhang L; Chen CM; Rong L
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):546. PubMed ID: 32799839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results.
    Staats PS; Benyamin RM;
    Pain Physician; 2016 Feb; 19(2):25-38. PubMed ID: 26815247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.