These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37407851)

  • 21. Comparative observational study of surgical outcomes of lumbar foraminal stenosis using minimally invasive microsurgical extraforaminal decompression alone versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective cohort study.
    Kim HJ; Jeong JH; Cho HG; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Feb; 24(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 25253301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression in treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a matched retrospective study.
    Wang L; Wang T; Fan N; Yuan S; Du P; Si F; Wang A; Zang L
    Int Orthop; 2024 Jan; 48(1):201-209. PubMed ID: 37632530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ultrasonic bone curette-assisted unilateral approach for bilateral decompression with MIS-TLIF for severe lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ren Y; Nian Y; Sun T
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Apr; 25(1):315. PubMed ID: 38654251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Case-matched radiological and clinical outcome evaluation of interlaminar versus microsurgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Saravi B; Ülkümen S; Lang G; Couillard-Després S; Hassel F
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Aug; 32(8):2863-2874. PubMed ID: 36729245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Exploring the impact of mild-to-moderate foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 on clinical outcomes following L4-5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Lee HR; Cho JH; Lee DH; Seok SY; Hwang CJ; Lee CS
    Spine J; 2024 May; 24(5):820-830. PubMed ID: 38219839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparable increases in dural sac area after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: radiological results from a randomized controlled trial in the NORDSTEN study.
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg T; Haug KJ; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2254-2261. PubMed ID: 32556585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biportal Endoscopic Decompression of Exiting and Traversing Nerve Roots Through a Single Interlaminar Window Using a Contralateral Approach: Technical Feasibilities and Morphometric Changes of the Lumbar Canal and Foramen.
    Akbary K; Kim JS; Park CW; Jun SG; Hwang JH
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():153-161. PubMed ID: 29857220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short-term lumbar disc and lumbar stability changes of one-hole split endoscope technique treatment of spinal stenosis.
    Zhang J; Yan R; Xu S; Shao B; Dou Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Apr; 25(1):325. PubMed ID: 38659005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Efficacy analysis of OLIF combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with or without redundant nerve roots].
    Sun HZ; Zhang Y; Xiao L; Zhao QL; Liu C; Wu ZX
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2024 Apr; 37(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 38664203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Full-Endoscopic Foraminotomy with a Novel Large Endoscopic Trephine for Severe Degenerative Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis at L
    Song QP; Hai B; Zhao WK; Huang X; Liu KX; Zhu B; Liu XG
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Apr; 13(2):659-668. PubMed ID: 33506594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical outcome after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with insignificant lower extremity pain. A prospective cohort study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery.
    Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Austevoll IM; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 30669998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 10-year Longitudinal MRI Study of Intervertebral Disk Degeneration in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis After Posterior Lumbar Decompression Surgery.
    Fujii T; Daimon K; Ozaki M; Suzuki S; Takahashi Y; Tsuji O; Nagoshi N; Yagi M; Michikawa T; Matsumoto M; Nakamura M; Watanabe K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Jun; 48(12):815-824. PubMed ID: 37026757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term Outcomes after Microsurgical Decompression of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis and Adverse Effects of Preoperative Scoliosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Chang HS; Baba T; Matsumae M
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2021 Oct; 61(10):598-606. PubMed ID: 34408108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of the sagittal spinal profile type on the long-term outcome of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis after microsurgical decompression.
    Früh A; Sargut TA; Prinz V; Hecht N; Franke J; Dinkelbach M; Pöhlmann F; Vajkoczy P; Bayerl S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Sep; 41(3):353-359. PubMed ID: 38848599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Endoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Interlaminar Lumbar Decompression for Spinal Stenosis.
    Park CH; Lee SH
    Pain Physician; 2019 Nov; 22(6):E573-E578. PubMed ID: 31775410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Radiological characteristics and clinical manifestation of isolated lumbar foraminal stenosis].
    Chen X; Feng S; Guan H; Yu Z; Cui L; Wang Y; Xu S; Yuan X
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Aug; 53(8):584-8. PubMed ID: 26653957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surgical outcomes between posterior decompression alone and posterior decompression with fusion surgery among patients with Meyerding grade 2 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a multicenter cohort study.
    Tozawa K; Matsubayashi Y; Kato S; Doi T; Taniguchi Y; Kumanomido Y; Higashikawa A; Yosihida Y; Kawamura N; Sasaki K; Azuma S; Yu J; Hara N; Iizuka M; Ono T; Fukushima M; Takeshita Y; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Oct; 23(1):902. PubMed ID: 36209211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.