These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37407851)

  • 41. Percutaneous Intervertebral-Vacuum Polymethylmethacrylate Injection for Foraminal Stenosis with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.
    Nakamae T; Yamada K; Hiramatsu T; Ujigo S; Kamei N; Nakanishi K; Olmarker K; Adachi N; Fujimoto Y
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Sep; 165():e712-e720. PubMed ID: 35787962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Postoperative Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area as an Association for Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Radiological Results From the NORDSTEN-Spinal Stenosis Trial.
    Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Franssen E; Indrekvam K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 May; 48(10):688-694. PubMed ID: 36809364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Does the Severity of Foraminal Stenosis Impact Outcomes of Lumbar Decompression Surgery?
    Heard JC; Lee Y; Ezeonu T; Lambrechts MJ; Issa TZ; Yalla GR; Tran K; Singh A; Purtill C; Somers S; Becsey A; Canseco JA; Kurd MF; Kaye ID; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD; Kepler CK
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e296-e304. PubMed ID: 37633493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical outcome of percutaneous lumbar foraminoplasty using a safety-improved device in patients with lumbar foraminal spinal stenosis.
    Yoo Y; Moon JY; Yoon S; Kwon SM; Sim SE
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(15):e15169. PubMed ID: 30985699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Predictors for clinical outcomes of tubular surgery for endoscopic decompression in selected patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ikuta K; Sakamoto K; Hotta K; Kitamura T; Senba H; Shidahara S
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Oct; 142(10):2525-2532. PubMed ID: 33811543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Indirect decompression of lumbar stenosis with transpsoas interbody cages and percutaneous posterior instrumentation.
    Castellvi AE; Nienke TW; Marulanda GA; Murtagh RD; Santoni BG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1784-91. PubMed ID: 24474321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusions.
    Früh A; Leißa P; Tkatschenko D; Truckenmüller P; Wessels L; Vajkoczy P; Bayerl S
    Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3739-3748. PubMed ID: 36194374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Relationship between lumbar spinal stenosis and axial muscle wasting.
    Schönnagel L; Zhu J; Camino-Willhuber G; Guven AE; Tani S; Caffard T; Haffer H; Muellner M; Chiapparelli E; Arzani A; Amoroso K; Moser M; Shue J; Tan ET; Carrino JA; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):231-238. PubMed ID: 37788745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Gibson JNA; Depreitere B; Pflugmacher R; Schnake KJ; Fielding LC; Alamin TF; Goffin J
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3 Suppl):S23-S32. PubMed ID: 25579423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
    Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Posterolateral fusion combined with posterior decompression shows superiority in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis without lumbar disc protrusion or prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.
    Wang C; Yin X; Zhang L; Xue X; Xiang Y; Jin H; Liu M; Zhao J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 31969171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Retrospective analysis of accuracy and positive predictive value of preoperative lumbar MRI grading after successful outcome following outpatient endoscopic decompression for lumbar foraminal and lateral recess stenosis.
    Lewandrowski KU
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Apr; 179():74-80. PubMed ID: 30870712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Decompression of Lumbar Central Spinal Canal Stenosis Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Khalifeh JM; Massie LW; Dibble CF; Dorward IG; Macki M; Khandpur U; Alshohatee K; Jain D; Chang V; Ray WZ
    Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Oct; 34(8):E439-E449. PubMed ID: 33979102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: evaluation of surgically treated patients from the NORDSTEN study.
    Indrekvam K; Myklebust TÅ; Austevoll IM; Hermansen E; Banitalebi H; Bånerud IF; Weber C; Brisby H; Brox JI; Hellum C; Storheim K
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Nov; 33(11):4270-4280. PubMed ID: 39134699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Brox JI; Solberg TK; Storheim K; Rekeland F; Hermansen E; Indrekvam K; Hellum C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):404-413. PubMed ID: 27421276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Obese (Body Mass Index >30) Patients Have Greater Functional Improvement and Reach Equivalent Outcomes at 12 Months Following Decompression Surgery for Symptomatic Lumbar Stenosis.
    Elsayed G; Davis MC; Dupépé EC; McClugage SG; Szerlip P; Walters BC; Hadley MN
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():884-894. PubMed ID: 28642180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Change in Lumbar Lordosis after Decompressive Surgery in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients and Associations with Patient Related Outcomes 2 Years after Surgery. Radiological and Clinical Results from the NORDSTEN Spinal Stenosis Trial.
    Åkerstedt J; Wänman J; Banitalebi H; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Storheim K; Hellum C; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E; Brisby H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38736326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.