138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37409208)
1. A Comparison Between Ultrasound Pachymetry and CASIA2 (Anterior-Segment Optical Coherence Tomography) in the Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness.
Baxter J; Atwan N
Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e39921. PubMed ID: 37409208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of central corneal thickness using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound pachymetry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Garcia-Medina JJ; Garcia-Medina M; Garcia-Maturana C; Zanon-Moreno V; Pons-Vazquez S; Pinazo-Duran MD
Cornea; 2013 Jan; 32(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 22495027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Ultrasound Pachymetry.
Ramesh PV; Jha KN; Srikanth K
J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Aug; 11(8):NC08-NC11. PubMed ID: 28969170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a new anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Oculus Pentacam for measurement of anterior chamber depth and corneal thickness.
Li X; Zhou Y; Young CA; Chen A; Jin G; Zheng D
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Jul; 8(14):857. PubMed ID: 32793701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.
Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Optical and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Glaucoma Patients and Elderly and Young Controls.
Pillunat KR; Waibel S; Spoerl E; Herber R; Pillunat LE
J Glaucoma; 2019 Jun; 28(6):540-545. PubMed ID: 30855412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, Cirrus optical coherence tomography, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography.
Wongchaisuwat N; Metheetrairat A; Chonpimai P; Nujoi W; Prabhasawat P
Clin Ophthalmol; 2018; 12():1865-1873. PubMed ID: 30310265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central corneal thickness measurements obtained with anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography compared to ultrasound pachymetry in healthy subjects.
Vollmer L; Sowka J; Pizzimenti J; Yu X
Optometry; 2012 May; 83(5):167-72. PubMed ID: 23249119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
Erdur SK; Demirci G; Dikkaya F; Kocabora MS; Ozsutcu M
Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in pachymetry for glaucoma patients.
Ayala M; Strandås R
BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 15():124. PubMed ID: 26420690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal thickness mapping by 3D swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Neri A; Malori M; Scaroni P; Leaci R; Delfini E; Macaluso C
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 90(6):e452-7. PubMed ID: 22682316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
Li EY; Mohamed S; Leung CK; Rao SK; Cheng AC; Cheung CY; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1842-7. PubMed ID: 17507097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Central Corneal Thickness Using Ultrasound and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Pachymetry in Adults Attending A Private Eye Clinic in Abuja.
Okudo AC; Babalola OE
Niger Med J; 2022; 63(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 38798971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Standard Ultrasonic Pachymeter in Premature Infants.
Hekimoglu E; Erol MK; Toslak D; Turgut Coban D; Doğan B; Yucel O
J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():129269. PubMed ID: 26266043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Anterior Segment OCT and Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
Scotto R; Bagnis A; Papadia M; Cutolo CA; Risso D; Traverso CE
J Glaucoma; 2017 Oct; 26(10):860-865. PubMed ID: 28834824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability and agreement of CCT measurement in myopia using entacam and ultrasound pachymetry.
Luo YH; Zhong Q; Ouyang PB; Guo XJ; Duan XC
Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 22773982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Agreement of corneal curvature and central corneal thickness obtained from a swept-source OCT and Pentacam in ectopia lentis patients.
Jin GM; Xiao B; Zhou YJ; Wang YY; Li XP; Zheng DY
Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(8):1244-1249. PubMed ID: 32821678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of corneal refractive power and astigmatism measured by the new anterior segment optical coherence tomographic device and Scheimpflug imaging device in age-related cataract patients].
Gao YC; Jiang YF; Lin S; Tian F
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 57(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 33412642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Six Methods of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Healthy Eyes.
Ucak T; Icel E; Tasli NG; Karakurt Y; Yilmaz H; Ugurlu A; Demir M
Beyoglu Eye J; 2021; 6(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 35005485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
