These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Targeted mutagenesis with sequence-specific nucleases for accelerated improvement of polyploid crops: Progress, challenges, and prospects. May D; Paldi K; Altpeter F Plant Genome; 2023 Jun; 16(2):e20298. PubMed ID: 36692095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genome Editing for Sustainable Crop Improvement and Mitigation of Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Hamdan MF; Karlson CKS; Teoh EY; Lau SE; Tan BC Plants (Basel); 2022 Oct; 11(19):. PubMed ID: 36235491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recent advances and challenges in potato improvement using CRISPR/Cas genome editing. Chincinska IA; Miklaszewska M; Sołtys-Kalina D Planta; 2022 Dec; 257(1):25. PubMed ID: 36562862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis: An opportunity for yield improvements of crop plants grown under environmental stresses. Abdelrahman M; Al-Sadi AM; Pour-Aboughadareh A; Burritt DJ; Tran LP Plant Physiol Biochem; 2018 Oct; 131():31-36. PubMed ID: 29628199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Improvement of Crops Using the CRISPR/Cas System: New Target Genes]. Ukhatova YV; Erastenkova MV; Korshikova ES; Krylova EA; Mikhailova AS; Semilet TV; Tikhonova NG; Shvachko NA; Khlestkina EK Mol Biol (Mosk); 2023; 57(3):387-410. PubMed ID: 37326044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brassica carinata genome characterization clarifies U's triangle model of evolution and polyploidy in Brassica. Song X; Wei Y; Xiao D; Gong K; Sun P; Ren Y; Yuan J; Wu T; Yang Q; Li X; Nie F; Li N; Feng S; Pei Q; Yu T; Zhang C; Liu T; Wang X; Yang J Plant Physiol; 2021 May; 186(1):388-406. PubMed ID: 33599732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the potential of CRISPR/Cas genome editing for vegetable crop improvement: An overview of challenges and approaches. Das T; Anand U; Pal T; Mandal S; Kumar M; Radha ; Gopalakrishnan AV; Lastra JMP; Dey A Biotechnol Bioeng; 2023 May; 120(5):1215-1228. PubMed ID: 36740587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CRISPR/Cas9 technology for improving agronomic traits and future prospective in agriculture. Rao MJ; Wang L Planta; 2021 Sep; 254(4):68. PubMed ID: 34498163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recalcitrance to transformation, a hindrance for genome editing of legumes. Nivya VM; Shah JM Front Genome Ed; 2023; 5():1247815. PubMed ID: 37810593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Progresses of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in forage crops. Ul Haq SI; Zheng D; Feng N; Jiang X; Qiao F; He JS; Qiu QS J Plant Physiol; 2022 Dec; 279():153860. PubMed ID: 36371870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current achievements and future prospects of genetic engineering in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.). Thakur AK; Parmar N; Singh KH; Nanjundan J Planta; 2020 Sep; 252(4):56. PubMed ID: 32951089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CRISPR/Cas technology for improving nutritional values in the agricultural sector: an update. Chaudhary M; Mukherjee TK; Singh R; Gupta M; Goyal S; Singhal P; Kumar R; Bhusal N; Sharma P Mol Biol Rep; 2022 Jul; 49(7):7101-7110. PubMed ID: 35568789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Harnessing tissue-specific genome editing in plants through CRISPR/Cas system: current state and future prospects. Singha DL; Das D; Sarki YN; Chowdhury N; Sharma M; Maharana J; Chikkaputtaiah C Planta; 2021 Dec; 255(1):28. PubMed ID: 34962611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genome editing in grass plants. Char SN; Yang B aBIOTECH; 2020 Jan; 1(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 36305004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]