These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37409505)

  • 1. Exploring the effect of cryopreservation in assisted reproductive technology and potential epigenetic risk.
    Sciorio R; Campos G; Tramontano L; Bulletti FM; Baldini GM; Vinciguerra M
    Zygote; 2023 Oct; 31(5):420-432. PubMed ID: 37409505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of genetic and epigenetic alteration in children conceived following ART: Is it time to return to nature whenever possible?
    Sciorio R; Tramontano L; Rapalini E; Bellaminutti S; Bulletti FM; D'Amato A; Manna C; Palagiano A; Bulletti C; Esteves SC
    Clin Genet; 2023 Feb; 103(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 36109352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Induce Epigenetic Changes to Gametes and Embryos?
    Sciorio R; Manna C; Fauque P; Rinaudo P
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jul; 12(13):. PubMed ID: 37445479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epigenetic Risks of Medically Assisted Reproduction.
    Sciorio R; El Hajj N
    J Clin Med; 2022 Apr; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 35456243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction.
    Jiang Z; Wang Y; Lin J; Xu J; Ding G; Huang H
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Oct; 44():90-104. PubMed ID: 28844405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-utero stress and mode of conception: impact on regulation of imprinted genes, fetal development and future health.
    Argyraki M; Damdimopoulou P; Chatzimeletiou K; Grimbizis GF; Tarlatzis BC; Syrrou M; Lambropoulos A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2019 Nov; 25(6):777-801. PubMed ID: 31633761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What impact does oocyte vitrification have on epigenetics and gene expression?
    Barberet J; Barry F; Choux C; Guilleman M; Karoui S; Simonot R; Bruno C; Fauque P
    Clin Epigenetics; 2020 Aug; 12(1):121. PubMed ID: 32778156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive technologies, female infertility, and the risk of imprinting-related disorders.
    Fauque P; De Mouzon J; Devaux A; Epelboin S; Gervoise-Boyer MJ; Levy R; Valentin M; Viot G; Bergère A; De Vienne C; Jonveaux P; Pessione F
    Clin Epigenetics; 2020 Dec; 12(1):191. PubMed ID: 33308308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technology, epigenetics, and long-term health: a developmental time bomb still ticking.
    Grace KS; Sinclair KD
    Semin Reprod Med; 2009 Sep; 27(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 19711251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technology and imprinting errors: analyzing underlying mechanisms from epigenetic regulation.
    Zhang G; Mao Y; Zhang Y; Huang H; Pan J
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Oct; 26(4):864-878. PubMed ID: 37929309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epigenetics, genomic imprinting and assisted reproductive technology.
    Le Bouc Y; Rossignol S; Azzi S; Steunou V; Netchine I; Gicquel C
    Ann Endocrinol (Paris); 2010 May; 71(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 20362968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epigenetics: definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective.
    Dupont C; Armant DR; Brenner CA
    Semin Reprod Med; 2009 Sep; 27(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 19711245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imprinting and assisted reproductive technology.
    Maher ER
    Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Apr; 14 Spec No 1():R133-8. PubMed ID: 15809265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Parental imprinting related to Assisted Reproductive Technologies].
    Fauque P; Jouannet P; Jammes H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18922729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Birth weight and frozen embryo transfer: State of the art].
    Anav M; Ferrières-Hoa A; Gala A; Fournier A; Zaragoza S; Vintejoux E; Vincens C; Hamamah S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 May; 46(5):489-496. PubMed ID: 29680508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epigenetic Influences During the Periconception Period and Assisted Reproduction.
    Amoako AA; Nafee TM; Ola B
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2017; 1014():15-39. PubMed ID: 28864983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro culture increases the frequency of stochastic epigenetic errors at imprinted genes in placental tissues from mouse concepti produced through assisted reproductive technologies.
    de Waal E; Mak W; Calhoun S; Stein P; Ord T; Krapp C; Coutifaris C; Schultz RM; Bartolomei MS
    Biol Reprod; 2014 Feb; 90(2):22. PubMed ID: 24337315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gametes and embryo epigenetic reprogramming affect developmental outcome: implication for assisted reproductive technologies.
    Jacob S; Moley KH
    Pediatr Res; 2005 Sep; 58(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 16148054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of assisted reproduction, infertility, sex and paternal factors on the placental DNA methylome.
    Choufani S; Turinsky AL; Melamed N; Greenblatt E; Brudno M; Bérard A; Fraser WD; Weksberg R; Trasler J; Monnier P;
    Hum Mol Genet; 2019 Feb; 28(3):372-385. PubMed ID: 30239726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.