138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37410610)
1. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate for Pocket Control without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 4-Year Review.
Movassaghi K; Gilson A; Stewart CN; Cusic J; Movassaghi A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jul; 154(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 37410610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Safran T; Al-Badarin F; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):22e-31e. PubMed ID: 35499675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study.
Marquez JL; French M; Ormiston L; Pires G; Martheswaran T; Eddington D; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Feb; 89():97-104. PubMed ID: 38160591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience with 201 Consecutive Patients.
Safran T; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr; 145(4):686e-696e. PubMed ID: 32221195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of polyurethane versus acellular dermal matrix coating on prepectoral reconstruction outcomes: Interface does matter.
Correia-Pinto JM; Andresen C; Barbosa JP; Poleri F; Casimiro R; Gonçalves D; Baptista D; Coelho G; Cunha C; Costa H
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Apr; 91():15-23. PubMed ID: 38401273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Urban C; González E; Fornazari A; Berman G; Spautz C; Kuroda F; Furlan Anselmi K; Rabinovich I; Dória M; Nissen L; Schünemann E; Sobreiro B; Lima R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Nov; 150(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 35994351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Algorithmic Approach to Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Version 2.0.
Antony AK; Robinson EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 May; 143(5):1311-1319. PubMed ID: 31033812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors.
Nealon KP; Weitzman RE; Sobti N; Gadd M; Specht M; Jimenez RB; Ehrlichman R; Faulkner HR; Austen WG; Liao EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):898e-908e. PubMed ID: 32332523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Poly-4-Hydroxybutyric Acid Mesh Compares Favorably With Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Levy AS; Bernstein JL; Xia JJ; Otterburn DM
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Jul; 85(S1 Suppl 1):S2-S7. PubMed ID: 32243319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review of complications in prepectoral breast reconstruction.
Wagner RD; Braun TL; Zhu H; Winocour S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Jul; 72(7):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 31076195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?
Samaha Y; Chen J; Ray EC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():178-181. PubMed ID: 37028245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhu L; Liu C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 36947180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. When to Consider Prepectoral Implant Conversion After Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction and How to Plan It.
Salgarello M; Barone Adesi L; Macrì G; Visconti G
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):NP1071-NP1077. PubMed ID: 37668406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Premastectomy Versus Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Outcomes in Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Sinnott CJ; Pronovost MT; Persing SM; Wu R; Young AO
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 87(1s Suppl 1):S21-S27. PubMed ID: 33833185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes Utilizing Inspira Implants in Revisionary Reconstructive Surgery.
Sigalove S; Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jul; 144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery):66S-72S. PubMed ID: 31246763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix with and without radiation sterilization process in immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
Han WY; Han SJ; Kim EK; Han HH; Eom JS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Dec; 87():461-466. PubMed ID: 37944457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
Faulkner HR; Shikowitz-Behr L; McLeod M; Wright E; Hulsen J; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):731e-736e. PubMed ID: 33234950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
