155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37411022)
21. Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.
Ghosh J; Papadopoulou A; Devall AJ; Jeffery HC; Beeson LE; Do V; Price MJ; Tobias A; Tunçalp Ö; Lavelanet A; Gülmezoglu AM; Coomarasamy A; Gallos ID
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 6(6):CD012602. PubMed ID: 34061352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Randomized trial of misoprostol and cervagem in combination with a reduced dose of mifepristone for induction of abortion.
Baird DT; Sukcharoen N; Thong KJ
Hum Reprod; 1995 Jun; 10(6):1521-7. PubMed ID: 7593528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Home self-administration of vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion at 50-63 days compared with gestation of below 50 days.
Kopp Kallner H; Fiala C; Stephansson O; Gemzell-Danielsson K
Hum Reprod; 2010 May; 25(5):1153-7. PubMed ID: 20172871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A prospective, comparative study of clinical outcomes following clinic-based versus self-use of medical abortion.
Kapp N; Mao B; Menzel J; Eckersberger E; Saphonn V; Rathavy T; Pearson E
BMJ Sex Reprod Health; 2023 Oct; 49(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36894309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accounting for Misclassification and Selection Bias in Estimating Effectiveness of Self-managed Medication Abortion.
Jayaweera RT; Bradshaw PT; Gerdts C; Egwuatu I; Grosso B; Kristianingrum I; Nmezi S; Zurbriggen R; Ahern J; Moseson H
Epidemiology; 2023 Jan; 34(1):140-149. PubMed ID: 36455250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Barriers to abortion care and incidence of attempted self-managed abortion among individuals searching Google for abortion care: A national prospective study.
Upadhyay UD; Cartwright AF; Grossman D
Contraception; 2022 Feb; 106():49-56. PubMed ID: 34560051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Expulsion at home for early medical abortion: A systematic review with meta-analyses.
Schmidt-Hansen M; Pandey A; Lohr PA; Nevill M; Taylor P; Hasler E; Cameron S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Apr; 100(4):727-735. PubMed ID: 33063314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Follow-up strategies to confirm the success of medical abortion of pregnancies up to 10 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses.
Schmidt-Hansen M; Cameron S; Lohr PA; Hasler E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):551-563.e13. PubMed ID: 31715147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Women's self-reported experiences using misoprostol obtained from drug sellers: a prospective cohort study in Lagos State, Nigeria.
Stillman M; Owolabi O; Fatusi AO; Akinyemi AI; Berry AL; Erinfolami TP; Olagunju OS; Väisänen H; Bankole A
BMJ Open; 2020 May; 10(5):e034670. PubMed ID: 32376752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Medical methods for first trimester abortion.
Kulier R; Kapp N; Gülmezoglu AM; Hofmeyr GJ; Cheng L; Campana A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Nov; 2011(11):CD002855. PubMed ID: 22071804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adjunct mifepristone for cervical preparation prior to dilation and evacuation: a randomized trial.
Shaw KA; Shaw JG; Hugin M; Velasquez G; Hopkins FW; Blumenthal PD
Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 25499589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Medical abortion with mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol between 64 and 70 days' gestation.
Hsia JK; Lohr PA; Taylor J; Creinin MD
Contraception; 2019 Sep; 100(3):178-181. PubMed ID: 31102629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective study of home use of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion up to 10weeks of pregnancy in Kazakhstan.
Platais I; Tsereteli T; Grebennikova G; Lotarevich T; Winikoff B
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 134(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 27352735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effectiveness and acceptability of home use of misoprostol for medical abortion up to 10 weeks of pregnancy.
Podolskyi V; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Maltzman LL; Marions L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 May; 102(5):541-548. PubMed ID: 36933004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Early medical abortion using low-dose mifepristone followed by buccal misoprostol: a large Australian observational study.
Goldstone P; Michelson J; Williamson E
Med J Aust; 2012 Sep; 197(5):282-6. PubMed ID: 22938126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of vaginal and buccal misoprostol after mifepristone for medication abortion through 70 days of gestation: A retrospective chart review.
Young D; Fitzgerald K; Laursen L; Whitaker AK
Contraception; 2022 Nov; 115():62-66. PubMed ID: 35772525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical Preparation Before Dilation and Evacuation Using Adjunctive Misoprostol or Mifepristone Compared With Overnight Osmotic Dilators Alone: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Goldberg AB; Fortin JA; Drey EA; Dean G; Lichtenberg ES; Bednarek PH; Chen BA; Dutton C; McKetta S; Maurer R; Winikoff B; Fitzmaurice GM
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 126(3):599-609. PubMed ID: 26196084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low-dose mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol for abortion.
Schaff EA; Eisinger SH; Stadalius LS; Franks P; Gore BZ; Poppema S
Contraception; 1999 Jan; 59(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10342079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acceptability of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States: a prospective comparison study.
Jensen JT; Harvey SM; Beckman LJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1292-9. PubMed ID: 10871441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Implications of using home urine pregnancy tests versus facility-based tests for assessment of outcome following medication abortion provided via telemedicine.
Anger HA; Raymond EG
Contraception; 2023 Aug; 124():110055. PubMed ID: 37088124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
