137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37415100)
1. Minimal important difference, patient acceptable symptom state and longitudinal validity of oxford elbow score and the quickDASH in patients with tennis elbow.
Karjalainen T; Lähdeoja T; Salmela M; Ardern CL; Juurakko J; Järvinen TL; Taimela S;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):158. PubMed ID: 37415100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for common outcome instruments in patients with a closed humeral shaft fracture - analysis of the FISH randomised clinical trial data.
Ibounig T; Juurakko J; Lähdeoja T; Sumrein BO; Järvinen TLN; Paavola M; Ardern CL; Karjalainen T; Taimela S; Rämö L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):291. PubMed ID: 36357855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow Score following surgery.
Dawson J; Doll H; Boller I; Fitzpatrick R; Little C; Rees J; Carr A
Qual Life Res; 2008 Dec; 17(10):1257-67. PubMed ID: 18958582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Oxford Elbow Score demonstrated good measurement properties when used with a shortened 7-day recall period.
Jonsson EÖ; Wänström J; Björnsson Hallgren H; Adolfsson L
JSES Int; 2023 May; 7(3):499-505. PubMed ID: 37266162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimal important change and other measurement properties of the Oxford Elbow Score and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand in patients with a simple elbow dislocation; validation study alongside the multicenter FuncSiE trial.
Iordens GIT; Den Hartog D; Tuinebreijer WE; Eygendaal D; Schep NWL; Verhofstad MHJ; Van Lieshout EMM;
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0182557. PubMed ID: 28886018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score.
de Haan J; Goei H; Schep NW; Tuinebreijer WE; Patka P; den Hartog D
J Orthop Surg Res; 2011 Jul; 6():39. PubMed ID: 21801443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis by Percutaneous Perforation, Injectables Have No Added Value.
Keijsers R; Kuijer PPFM; Gerritsma-Bleeker CLE; Kleinlugtenbelt YV; Beumer A; The B; Landman EBM; de Vries AJ; Eygendaal D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Feb; 482(2):325-336. PubMed ID: 37594385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score.
Ngwayi JRM; Tan J; Liang N; Sita EGE; Porter DE
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 15(1):562. PubMed ID: 33243269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the cross-cultural adapted Italian version of the Oxford Elbow Score.
Padovani S; Capuzzo M; Massari L; Caruso G; Arrigoni P; Zaolino C; Cucchi D; Valpiani G; Colozza A
JSES Int; 2021 Mar; 5(2):328-333. PubMed ID: 33681858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) for patients with osteoarthritis at the base of thumb.
Stjernberg-Salmela S; Karjalainen T; Juurakko J; Toivonen P; Waris E; Taimela S; Ardern CL; Järvinen TLN; Jokihaara J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):127. PubMed ID: 35488190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for pain, Constant-Murley score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with subacromial pain syndrome.
Kanto K; Lähdeoja T; Paavola M; Aronen P; Järvinen TLN; Jokihaara J; Ardern CL; Karjalainen TV; Taimela S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):45. PubMed ID: 33676417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinimetric testing of the Persian version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaires in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy.
Farzad M; MacDermid JC; Shafiee E; Beygi AS; Vafaei A; Varahra A; Beikpour H
Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(12):2902-2907. PubMed ID: 33180555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Establishing the Patient Acceptable Symptom State in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Population for the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE Computer Adaptive Tests.
Hubbard J; Rogers MJ; Cizik AM; Zhang C; Presson AP; Kazmers NH
J Hand Surg Am; 2024 Mar; 49(3):282.e1-282.e12. PubMed ID: 36116991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The minimal clinically important difference of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and upper extremity computer adaptive tests and QuickDASH in the setting of elbow trauma.
Randall DJ; Zhang Y; Harris AP; Qiu Y; Li H; Stephens AR; Kazmers NH
JSES Int; 2021 Nov; 5(6):1132-1138. PubMed ID: 34766096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional recovery in the surgical treatment of tennis elbow: side-to-side vs. tendon-to-bone attachment using a knotless suture anchor: a randomized controlled trial.
Lemmens L; De Houwer H; van Beek N; De Schrijver F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Apr; 32(4):751-759. PubMed ID: 36584873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of the QuickDASH in patients with shoulder-related disorders undergoing surgery.
Macdermid JC; Khadilkar L; Birmingham TB; Athwal GS
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Jan; 45(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 25394688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH).
Franchignoni F; Vercelli S; Giordano A; Sartorio F; Bravini E; Ferriero G
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2014 Jan; 44(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24175606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the patient rated tennis elbow evaluation.
Altan L; Ercan I; Konur S
Rheumatol Int; 2010 Jun; 30(8):1049-54. PubMed ID: 19707766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Responsiveness and minimal important change of the QuickDASH and PSFS when used among patients with shoulder pain.
Rysstad T; Grotle M; Klokk LP; Tveter AT
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 May; 21(1):328. PubMed ID: 32460743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of patient recall of hand and elbow disability on the QuickDASH questionnaire over a two-year period.
Stepan JG; London DA; Boyer MI; Calfee RP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e176. PubMed ID: 24257676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
