These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Surgical site markers: potential source of infection. Driessche AM Orthop Nurs; 2012; 31(6):344-7. PubMed ID: 23168939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing clarity and erasability of commercially available pens for surgical site marking: a comparative study in human volunteers. Sim FC; Angadi D; Jarvis GE; Porteous M Patient Saf Surg; 2016; 10():11. PubMed ID: 26997976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical site marking does not affect sterility. Rooney J; Khoo OK; Higgs AR; Small TJ; Bell S ANZ J Surg; 2008 Aug; 78(8):688-9. PubMed ID: 18796029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the sterility and visibility of surgical marking pens available in Australia. O'Bryan E; Pollock M; Joseph S ANZ J Surg; 2019 Sep; 89(9):1114-1118. PubMed ID: 31069943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sterility of surgical site marking. Cronen G; Ringus V; Sigle G; Ryu J J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Oct; 87(10):2193-5. PubMed ID: 16203882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using marker pens on patients: a potential source of cross infection with MRSA. Tadiparthi S; Shokrollahi K; Juma A; Croall J Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Oct; 89(7):661-4. PubMed ID: 17959001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Which pen? A comparative study of surgical site markers. Bathla S; Nevins EJ; Moori PL; Vimalachandran D J Perioper Pract; 2018; 28(1-2):21-26. PubMed ID: 29376785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The risk of cross-infection when marking surgical patients prior to surgery - review of two types of marking pens. Ballal MS; Shah N; Ballal M; O'Donoghue M; Pegg DJ Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 Apr; 89(3):226-8. PubMed ID: 17394703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs. J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visibility of surgical site marking: a prospective randomized trial of two skin preparation solutions. Thakkar SC; Mears SC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jan; 94(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22257994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Henna as a durable preoperative skin marker. Mehendale VG; Chaudhari NC; Shenoy SN; Mehendale AV World J Surg; 2011 Feb; 35(2):311-5. PubMed ID: 21132296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ease of use and preference for a new disposable self-injection pen compared with a reusable pen for administering recombinant human growth hormone: A multicenter, 2-month, single-arm, open-label clinical trial in patient-caregiver dyads. Hey-Hadavi J; Pleil A; Deeb LC; Fuqua JS; Silverman LA; Reiner B; Newfield R; Rajicic N; Wajnrajch MP; Cara JF Clin Ther; 2010 Nov; 32(12):2036-47. PubMed ID: 21118739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section. Hadiati DR; Hakimi M; Nurdiati DS; da Silva Lopes K; Ota E Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):CD007462. PubMed ID: 30346040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current practice on preoperative correct site surgical marking. Masud D; Moore A; Massouh F J Perioper Pract; 2010 Jun; 20(6):210-4. PubMed ID: 20586361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]