These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37416078)
1. The Bayesian Mutation Sampler Explains Distributions of Causal Judgments. Kolvoort IR; Temme N; van Maanen L Open Mind (Camb); 2023; 7():318-349. PubMed ID: 37416078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments. Zhu JQ; Sanborn AN; Chater N Psychol Rev; 2020 Oct; 127(5):719-748. PubMed ID: 32191073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Process Model of Causal Reasoning. Davis ZJ; Rehder B Cogn Sci; 2020 May; 44(5):e12839. PubMed ID: 32419205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts. Shengelia T; Lagnado D Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The autocorrelated Bayesian sampler: A rational process for probability judgments, estimates, confidence intervals, choices, confidence judgments, and response times. Zhu JQ; Sundh J; Spicer J; Chater N; Sanborn AN Psychol Rev; 2024 Mar; 131(2):456-493. PubMed ID: 37289507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A theory of learning to infer. Dasgupta I; Schulz E; Tenenbaum JB; Gershman SJ Psychol Rev; 2020 Apr; 127(3):412-441. PubMed ID: 32223286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian generic priors for causal learning. Lu H; Yuille AL; Liljeholm M; Cheng PW; Holyoak KJ Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):955-84. PubMed ID: 18954210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Explaining Away, Augmentation, and the Assumption of Independence. Cruz N; Hahn U; Fenton N; Lagnado D Front Psychol; 2020; 11():502751. PubMed ID: 33224043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identifying expectations about the strength of causal relationships. Yeung S; Griffiths TL Cogn Psychol; 2015 Feb; 76():1-29. PubMed ID: 25522277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A unified explanation of variability and bias in human probability judgments: How computational noise explains the mean-variance signature. Sundh J; Zhu JQ; Chater N; Sanborn A J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Oct; 152(10):2842-2860. PubMed ID: 37199970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Context-Dependent Bayesian Account for Causal-Based Categorization. Marchant N; Quillien T; Chaigneau SE Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 47(1):e13240. PubMed ID: 36680423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Processing Probability Information in Nonnumerical Settings - Teachers' Bayesian and Non-bayesian Strategies During Diagnostic Judgment. Leuders T; Loibl K Front Psychol; 2020; 11():678. PubMed ID: 32719627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic reasoning. Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 May; 140(2):168-85. PubMed ID: 21219081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A quantitative causal model theory of conditional reasoning. Fernbach PM; Erb CD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1327-43. PubMed ID: 23565785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whose statistical reasoning is facilitated by a causal structure intervention? McNair S; Feeney A Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):258-64. PubMed ID: 24825305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do people reason rationally about causally related events? Markov violations, weak inferences, and failures of explaining away. Rottman BM; Hastie R Cogn Psychol; 2016 Jun; 87():88-134. PubMed ID: 27261539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neural correlates of causal power judgments. Cummins DD Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():1014. PubMed ID: 25566033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]