These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37417060)

  • 21. A comparative evaluation of cleaning efficacy (debris and smear layer removal) of hand and two NiTi rotary instrumentation systems (K3 and ProTaper): a SEM study.
    Reddy KB; Dash S; Kallepalli S; Vallikanthan S; Chakrapani N; Kalepu V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24858745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effectiveness of a self-adjusting file to remove residual gutta-percha after retreatment with rotary files.
    Abramovitz I; Relles-Bonar S; Baransi B; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2012 Apr; 45(4):386-92. PubMed ID: 22283664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
    Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of Root Canal Cleaning and Shaping Efficacy of Three Engine-driven Instruments: SafeSider, ProTaper Universal and Lightspeed LSX.
    Wigler R; Koren T; Tsesis I
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Nov; 16(11):910-4. PubMed ID: 26718300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals.
    Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative evaluation of change in root canal shape and area in primary molars using ProTaper and K3 rotary systems:
    Sharma P; Kurthukoti AJ; Sebastian A; Mallikarjun SB
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(4):392-397. PubMed ID: 35102964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time using Two Modified Rotary File Systems with Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth.
    Govindaraju L; Jeevanandan G; Subramanian E
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Sep; 11(9):ZC55-ZC58. PubMed ID: 29207834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O
    J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.
    Hülsmann M; Bluhm V
    Int Endod J; 2004 Jul; 37(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 15189436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with two different rotary systems followed by a self-adjusting file.
    Cakici F; Cakici EB; Küçükekenci FF
    Int J Artif Organs; 2016 Feb; 39(2):68-71. PubMed ID: 26953903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
    Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
    J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of self-adjusting file, Mtwo, and ProTaper on the root canal wall.
    Hin ES; Wu MK; Wesselink PR; Shemesh H
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):262-4. PubMed ID: 23321242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals - a micro-computed tomography study.
    Rödig T; Hausdörfer T; Konietschke F; Dullin C; Hahn W; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):580-9. PubMed ID: 22264204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial.
    Divya S; Jeevanandan G; Sujatha S; Subramanian EMG; Ravindran V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(6):904-908. PubMed ID: 31939369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the Effect of Different Root Canal Preparation Techniques in Primary Teeth Using CBCT.
    Shaikh SM; Goswami M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 42(4):250-255. PubMed ID: 29750624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals.
    Gu LS; Ling JQ; Wei X; Huang XY
    Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 18081804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of dentinal crack propagation, amount of gutta percha remaining and time required during removal of gutta percha using two different rotary instruments and hand instruments - An
    Tejaswi S; Singh A; Manglekar S; Ambikathanaya UK; Shetty S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 25(4):524-530. PubMed ID: 35439914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficacy of Combined Use of Different Nickel-Titanium Files on Removing Root Canal Filling Materials.
    Yürüker S; Görduysus M; Küçükkaya S; Uzunoğlu E; Ilgın C; Gülen O; Tuncel B; Görduysus MÖ
    J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 26778268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.