These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37417665)

  • 1. Automated detection of auditory response: non-detection stopping criterion and repeatability studies for multichannel EEG.
    Vaz PN; Antunes F; Mendes EMAM; Felix LB
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2024 Jul; 27(9):1150-1160. PubMed ID: 37417665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Faster automatic ASSR detection using sequential tests.
    Zanotelli T; Antunes F; Simpson DM; Mazoni Andrade Marçal Mendes E; Felix LB
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):631-639. PubMed ID: 32091286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory steady state responses in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults: an analysis of between-session amplitude and latency repeatability, test time, and F ratio detection paradigms.
    Wilding TS; McKay CM; Baker RJ; Kluk K
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):267-78. PubMed ID: 21909024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A bayesian approach to the spectral F-Test: Application to auditory steady-state responses.
    Romao M; Tierra-Criollo CJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jan; 183():105100. PubMed ID: 31622797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic audiometry using auditory steady-state response and sequential test strategy applied to volunteers with normal hearing.
    Zanotelli T; Antunes F; Mendes EMAM; Felix LB
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 279(12):5885-5895. PubMed ID: 35763084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dealing with correlations in the multichannel EEG using bipolar derivations and Monte Carlo simulations: application to the detection of auditory steady-state responses.
    Zanotelli T; Antunes F; Mendes EMAM; Felix LB
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Mar; 61(3):811-819. PubMed ID: 36607504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving auditory steady-state response detection using independent component analysis on multichannel EEG data.
    Van Dun B; Wouters J; Moonen M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1220-30. PubMed ID: 17605353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Speed and Accuracy of Next-Generation Auditory Steady State Response and Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in Children With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.
    Sininger YS; Hunter LL; Hayes D; Roush PA; Uhler KM
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1207-1223. PubMed ID: 29624540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of auditory threshold using Multiple Magnitude-Squared Coherence and amplitude modulated tones monaural stimulation around 40 Hz.
    Silva GM; Antunes F; Henrique CS; Felix LB
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jun; 159():71-76. PubMed ID: 29650320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and time efficiency of two ASSR analysis methods using clinical test protocols.
    Vander Werff KR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):433-52. PubMed ID: 19928397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated detection of auditory response: applying sequential detection strategies with constant significance level to magnitude-squared coherence.
    Antunes F; Zanotelli T; Bonato Felix L
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Sep; 58(9):598-603. PubMed ID: 31082276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol.
    Swanepoel D; Schmulian D; Hugo R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jan; 124(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 14977080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Casey KA; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Objective detection of auditory steady-state evoked potentials based on mutual information.
    Bidelman GM; Bhagat SP
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 26924597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Refining the audiological assessment in children using narrow-band CE-Chirp-evoked auditory steady state responses.
    Venail F; Artaud JP; Blanchet C; Uziel A; Mondain M
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 25036002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The estimation of behavioral audiograms, auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds of young adults with normal hearing].
    Szymańska A; Gryczyński M; Pajor A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 19205522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical application of dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses in high-risk newborns and young children.
    Luts H; Desloovere C; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 16219992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity and specificity of auditory steady-state response testing.
    Rabelo CM; Schochat E
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2011; 66(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 21437442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses in evaluating the hearing thresholds of occupational noise-exposed workers.
    Hsu RF; Chen SS; Lu SN; Ho CK; Lin HF
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):330-5. PubMed ID: 21802644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.