205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37418798)
1. Diagnostic performance of IOTA SR and O-RADS combined with CA125, HE4, and risk of malignancy algorithm to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Yang Y; Ju H; Huang Y
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110926. PubMed ID: 37418798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different strategies to triage women with adnexal masses: a prospective study.
Piovano E; Cavallero C; Fuso L; Viora E; Ferrero A; Gregori G; Grillo C; Macchi C; Mengozzi G; Mitidieri M; Pagano E; Zola P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 50(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 27706929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic accuracy of two human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) testing systems in combination with CA125 in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses.
Lenhard M; Stieber P; Hertlein L; Kirschenhofer A; Fürst S; Mayr D; Nagel D; Hofmann K; Krocker K; Burges A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Sep; 49(12):2081-8. PubMed ID: 21923475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic measures comparison for ovarian malignancy risk in Epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a meta-analysis.
Suri A; Perumal V; Ammalli P; Suryan V; Bansal SK
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17308. PubMed ID: 34453074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical value of O-RADS combined with serum CA125 and HE4 for the diagnosis of ovarian tumours.
Wang R; Li X; Li S; Fang S; Zhao C; Yang H; Yang Z
Acta Radiol; 2023 Feb; 64(2):821-828. PubMed ID: 35291856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions.
Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smolen A; Łoziński T; Guzik P; Kluz T
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the predictive performance of risk of malignancy indexes 1-4, HE4 and risk of malignancy algorithm in the triage of adnexal masses.
Hada A; Han LP; Chen Y; Hu QH; Yuan Y; Liu L
J Ovarian Res; 2020 Apr; 13(1):46. PubMed ID: 32334618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative HE4, CA125 and ROMA in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Terlikowska KM; Dobrzycka B; Witkowska AM; Mackowiak-Matejczyk B; Sledziewski TK; Kinalski M; Terlikowski SJ
J Ovarian Res; 2016 Jul; 9(1):43. PubMed ID: 27436085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of adnexal lesions using photoacoustic imaging to improve sonographic O-RADS risk assessment.
Zhu Q; Luo H; Middleton WD; Itani M; Hagemann IS; Hagemann AR; Hoegger MJ; Thaker PH; Kuroki LM; MCourt CK; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Siegel CL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 62(6):891-903. PubMed ID: 37606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiating Benign From Malignant Ovarian Masses With Solid Components: Diagnostic Performance of CEUS Combined With IOTA Simple Rules and O-RADS.
Lu B; He W; Liu C; Wang P; Yang P; Zhao Z; Qi J; Huang B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38876911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Combing O-RADS US and CA-125 Improve Diagnostic Accuracy in Assessing Adnexal Malignancy Risk in Women With Different Menopausal Status?
Wu M; Wang Q; Zhang M; Cao J; Chen Y; Zheng J; Luo L; Su M; Lin X; Kuang X; Zhang X
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(3):675-685. PubMed ID: 35880406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Ultrasound Scores in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.
Pelayo M; Pelayo-Delgado I; Sancho-Sauco J; Sanchez-Zurdo J; Abarca-Martinez L; Corraliza-Galán V; Martin-Gromaz C; Pablos-Antona MJ; Zurita-Calvo J; Alcázar JL
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37046525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of IOTA Simple Rules, IOTA ADNEX Model, RMI, and Subjective Assessment for Preoperative Adnexal Mass Evaluation: The Experience of a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
Vilendecic Z; Radojevic M; Stefanovic K; Dotlic J; Likic Ladjevic I; Dugalic S; Stefanovic A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2023; 88(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 36716716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the diagnostic value of using serum CA125 and GI-RADS system in the evaluation of adnexal masses.
Zheng H; Tie Y; Wang X; Yang Y; Wei X; Zhao X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(7):e14577. PubMed ID: 30762809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of serum cancer antigen 125, human epididymis protein 4, ROMA, and CPH-I for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in Chinese patients with ovarian mass].
Shipeng G; Yongning C; Yadi Z; Chanyuan LI; Qifan J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2019 Dec; 39(12):1393-1401. PubMed ID: 31907150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of applicability of HE4 and ROMA in the preoperative diagnosis of adnexal masses].
Janas L; Głowacka E; Wilczyński JR; Malinowski A; Nowak M
Ginekol Pol; 2015 Mar; 86(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 25920309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
