120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37419047)
41. Effective dose efficiency: an application-specific metric of quality and dose for digital radiography.
Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5099-118. PubMed ID: 21775791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography.
Vassileva J
Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):648-53. PubMed ID: 15326041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Optimisation of tube voltage range (kVp) for AP abdomen, pelvis and spine imaging of average patients with a digital radiography (DR) imaging system using a computer simulator.
Moore CS; Wood T; Balcam S; Needler L; Guest T; Ngu WP; Chong LW; Saunderson J; Beavis A
Br J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 93(1114):20200565. PubMed ID: 32783630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effective dose reduction in spine radiographic imaging by choosing the less radiation-sensitive side of the body.
Ben-Shlomo A; Bartal G; Mosseri M; Avraham B; Leitner Y; Shabat S
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 26704861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Increasing source-to-image distance to reduce radiation dose from digital radiography pelvic examinations.
England A; Evans P; Harding L; Taylor EM; Charnock P; Williams G
Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 25739106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Guidelines for anti-scatter grid use in pediatric digital radiography.
Fritz S; Jones AK
Pediatr Radiol; 2014 Mar; 44(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 24281685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4567-76. PubMed ID: 18975703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study.
Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):571-580. PubMed ID: 31385049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology.
Behrman RH
Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 12557981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR.
Shanahan MC
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 28687290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Relationship between the visual evaluation of pathology visibility and the physical measure of low contrast detail detectability in neonatal chest radiography.
Al-Murshedi S; Benhalim M; Alzyoud K; Papathanasiou S; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Nov; 28(4):1116-1121. PubMed ID: 36099681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The radiation dose, clinical and anatomical implications of erect lumbar spine radiography: A single centre pre-post implementation evaluation.
Bradley C; Snaith B
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Jul; 29(4):690-696. PubMed ID: 37187066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Relationship between body habitus and image quality and radiation dose in chest X-ray examinations: A phantom study.
Al-Murshedi S; Hogg P; England A
Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():65-71. PubMed ID: 30738533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
