These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
83. [Digital radiography of the thorax with selenium detector. Clinical results and optimization potential of the technique]. Procacci C; Minniti S; Caumo F; Moore F; Ternullo S; Predicatori F; Locatelli F; Pistolesi GF Radiol Med; 1998 Nov; 96(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 10051867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems. Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Dose Optimization for Computed Tomography Localizer Radiographs for Low-Dose Lung Computed Tomography Examinations. Schmidt BT; Hupfer M; Saltybaeva N; Kolditz D; Kalender WA Invest Radiol; 2017 Feb; 52(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 27518213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Effect of localizer radiograph on radiation dose associated with automatic exposure control: human cadaver and patient study. Singh S; Petrovic D; Jamnik E; Aran S; Pourjabbar S; Kave ML; Bradley SE; Choy G; Kalra MK J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 24632938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. The impact of gonad shielding in anteroposterior (AP) pelvis projections in an adult: A phantom study utilising digital radiography (DR). Davies BH; Manning-Stanley AS; Hughes VJ; Ward AJ Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):240-247. PubMed ID: 32089492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Effect of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction on lung lesion conspicuity at MDCT: does one size fit all? Botelho MP; Agrawal R; Gonzalez-Guindalini FD; Hart EM; Patel SK; Töre HG; Yaghmai V Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e726-33. PubMed ID: 23928232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose? Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Radiation dose reduction in cardiovascular CT angiography with iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D) in a swine model: a model of paediatric cardiac imaging. Zhao P; Hou Y; Liu Q; Ma Y; Guo Q Clin Radiol; 2016 Jul; 71(7):716.e7-716.e14. PubMed ID: 27180082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Image quality comparison between single energy and dual energy CT protocols for hepatic imaging. Yao Y; Ng JM; Megibow AJ; Pelc NJ Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4877. PubMed ID: 27487905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. An assessment of exposure indices in computed radiography for the posterior-anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine. Warren-Forward H; Arthur L; Hobson L; Skinner R; Watts A; Clapham K; Lou D; Cook A Br J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 80(949):26-31. PubMed ID: 16916804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system. Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Relationship Between Tube Voltage and Physical Image Quality of Pulmonary Nodules on Chest Radiographs Obtained Using the Bone-Suppression Technique. Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e174-e179. PubMed ID: 30269955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. X-ray beam energy, scatter, and radiation risk in chest radiography. Petrone TJ; Steidley KD; Appleby A; Christman E; Haughey F Health Phys; 1996 Apr; 70(4):488-97. PubMed ID: 8617588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Does dose optimisation in digital panoramic radiography affect diagnostic performance? Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Forner LA; Viccari C; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Feb; 25(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 32845471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Evaluation of the Patient Effective Dose in Whole Spine Scanography Based on the Automatic Image Pasting Method for Digital Radiography. Kim JS; Yoon SW; Seo DN; Nam SR; Kim JM Iran J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 13(1):e22514. PubMed ID: 27110338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Towards image quality, beam energy and effective dose optimisation in digital thoracic radiography. Launders JH; Cowen AR; Bury RF; Hawkridge P Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(5):870-5. PubMed ID: 11372626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Performance of automatic exposure control on dose and image quality: comparison between slot-scanning and flat-panel digital radiography systems. Boissonnat G; Morichau-Beauchant P; Reshef A; Villa C; Désauté P; Simon AC Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1162-1184. PubMed ID: 36069636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]