157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37419312)
1. Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, and Clinical Results Between 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage and Polyetheretherketone Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
Yang JJ; Kim DM; Park S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37419312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Sultana T; Hossain M; Jeong JH; Im S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e241-e255. PubMed ID: 37611804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Graft subsidence and reoperation after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched and cost analysis of polyetheretherketone versus 3D-printed porous titanium interbodies.
Alan N; Deng H; Muthiah N; Vodovotz L; Dembinski R; Guha D; Agarwal N; Ozpinar A; Hamilton DK; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 37178027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.
Adl Amini D; Okano I; Oezel L; Zhu J; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2377-2384. PubMed ID: 34215921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early Outcomes of Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Titanium versus Polyetheretherketone Cage Implantation for Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration.
Adl Amini D; Moser M; Oezel L; Zhu J; Okano I; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e14-e20. PubMed ID: 34863938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Duan Y; Feng D; Li T; Wang Y; Jiang L; Huang Y
World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():144-156. PubMed ID: 38145654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional trajectory screw fixation or cortical bone trajectory screw fixation: A comparative study between the polyetheretherketone cage and the same shape titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage.
Sakaura H; Ikegami D; Fujimori T; Sugiura T; Yamada S; Mukai Y
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 209():106945. PubMed ID: 34555798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reduced Subsidence With PEEK-Titanium Composite Versus 3D Titanium Cages in a Retrospective, Self-Controlled Study in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Chahlavi A
Global Spine J; 2024 May; ():21925682241253168. PubMed ID: 38780086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.
Massaad E; Fatima N; Kiapour A; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Shin JH
Neurospine; 2020 Mar; 17(1):125-135. PubMed ID: 32252163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Promotion of higher rates of early fusion using activated titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in adults undergoing 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a randomized controlled trial.
Toop N; Dhaliwal J; Gifford CS; Gibbs D; Keister A; Miracle S; Forghani R; Grossbach AJ; Farhadi HF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 37542447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Titanium-coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion With the Endplate Than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.
Hasegawa T; Ushirozako H; Shigeto E; Ohba T; Oba H; Mukaiyama K; Shimizu S; Yamato Y; Ide K; Shibata Y; Ojima T; Takahashi J; Haro H; Matsuyama Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Aug; 45(15):E892-E902. PubMed ID: 32675599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and safety of a CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 bioactive glass ceramic spacer in posterior lumbar interbody fusion compared with polyetheretherketone cage: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Kwon BT; Kim HJ; Lee S; Park SM; Ham DW; Park HJ; Kwon O; Yeom JS
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Jan; 165(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 36471204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison of Polyetheretherketone and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Singhatanadgige W; Tangchitcharoen N; Kerr SJ; Tanasansomboon T; Yingsakmongkol W; Kotheeranurak V; Limthongkul W
World Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 168():e471-e479. PubMed ID: 36216250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes between the n-HA/PA66 Cage and the PEEK Cage Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Matched-Pair Case Control Study.
Zhang Z; Hu BW; Wang L; Yang HL; Li T; Liu LM; Yang X; Song YM
Orthop Surg; 2023 Jan; 15(1):152-161. PubMed ID: 36398388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PLIF surgery with titanium-coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological study.
Schnake KJ; Fleiter N; Hoffmann C; Pingel A; Scholz M; Langheinrich A; Kandziora F
Eur Spine J; 2021 Jan; 30(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 33091142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PEEK Versus Titanium Static Interbody Cages: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for 1-Level TLIFs.
Canseco JA; Karamian BA; Patel PD; Divi SN; Timmons T; Hallman H; Nachwalter R; Lee JK; Kurd MF; Anderson DG; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD
Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Oct; 34(8):E483-E493. PubMed ID: 34369911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early Fusion Status After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation or Traditional Trajectory Screw Fixation: A Comparison Between the Titanium-coated Polyetheretherketone Cage and the Same Shape Polyetheretherketone Cage.
Sakaura H; Ikegami D; Fujimori T; Sugiura T; Mukai Y
Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Feb; 35(1):E47-E52. PubMed ID: 34369910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage: single-institution case series.
Alan N; Vodovotz L; Muthiah N; Deng H; Guha D; Agarwal N; Ozpinar A; Mushlin HM; Puccio L; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Nov; 37(5):663-669. PubMed ID: 35594892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
