154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37419312)
21. Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Kashii M; Kitaguchi K; Makino T; Kaito T
J Orthop Sci; 2020 Jul; 25(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31375363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Application of three-dimensional printed porous titanium alloy cage and poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
Wang Y; Zhou Y; Chai X; Zhuo H
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Sep; 36(9):1126-1131. PubMed ID: 36111476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of a Unilateral Bridging Cage for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 2-Year Clinical Results and Fusion Rate with a Focus on Subsidence.
Heinz von der Hoeh N; Villa T; Galbusera F; Voelker A; Spiegl UA; Jarvers JS; Heyde CE
World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e308-e314. PubMed ID: 29738859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages.
Tan JH; Cheong CK; Hey HWD
Eur Spine J; 2021 May; 30(5):1285-1295. PubMed ID: 33555365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Short-Term Radiographical and Clinical Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a 3D Porous Titanium Alloy Cage and a Titanium-Coated PEEK Cage.
Makino T; Takenaka S; Sakai Y; Yoshikawa H; Kaito T
Global Spine J; 2022 Jun; 12(5):931-939. PubMed ID: 33203254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Titanium‑coated polyetheretherketone cages vs. polyetheretherketone cages in lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.
Li S; Li X; Bai X; Wang Y; Han P; Li H
Exp Ther Med; 2023 Jun; 25(6):305. PubMed ID: 37229321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Randomized Controlled Trial of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Ti- and CaP-Nanocoated Polyetheretherketone Cages: Comparative Study of the 1-Year Radiological and Clinical Outcome.
Willems K; Lauweryns P; Verleye G; VAN Goethem J
Int J Spine Surg; 2019 Dec; 13(6):575-587. PubMed ID: 31970054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
Kim DY; Kwon OH; Park JY
Neurospine; 2022 Sep; 19(3):524-532. PubMed ID: 36203279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Choice of Spinal Interbody Fusion Cage Material and Design Influences Subsidence and Osseointegration Performance.
Fogel G; Martin N; Williams GM; Unger J; Yee-Yanagishita C; Pelletier M; Walsh W; Peng Y; Jekir M
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e626-e634. PubMed ID: 35346883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Early Fusion Status after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation: A Comparison of Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Cages and Carbon Polyetheretherketone Cages.
Sakaura H; Ohnishi A; Yamagishi A; Ohwada T
Asian Spine J; 2019 Apr; 13(2):248-253. PubMed ID: 30481976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical evaluation of autologous bone-cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis.
Zhu H; Zhong W; Zhang P; Liu X; Huang J; Liu F; Li J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):379. PubMed ID: 32534573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of 3D-printed titanium-alloy, standard titanium-alloy, and PEEK interbody spacers in an ovine model.
Van Horn MR; Beard R; Wang W; Cunningham BW; Mullinix KP; Allall M; Bucklen BS
Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2097-2103. PubMed ID: 34029756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biportal endoscopic extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium cage with large footprints: technical note and preliminary results.
You KH; Hwang JY; Hong SH; Kang MS; Park SM; Park HJ
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Jun; 165(6):1435-1443. PubMed ID: 37115323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Comparison of the effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery].
Zhu G; Hao Y; Yu L; Peng C; Zhu J; Zhang P
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 34(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 32538569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcome of Ti/PEEK Versus PEEK Cages in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Yao YC; Chou PH; Lin HH; Wang ST; Chang MC
Global Spine J; 2023 Mar; 13(2):472-478. PubMed ID: 33733888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiological comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two closed-box plasmapore coated titanium cages: follow-up study over more than seven years.
Kroppenstedt S; Gulde M; Schönmayr R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(19):2083-8. PubMed ID: 18758364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable vs Static Titanium Interbody Cages: A Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.
Huo CW; Malham GM; Biddau DT; Chung T; Wang YY
Int J Spine Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):265-275. PubMed ID: 36889901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Titanium interlayer-mediated hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Zhu C; He M; Mao L; Yang H; Hu B; Zhang L; Feng G; Liu L; Song Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(1):918. PubMed ID: 34724952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature.
Seaman S; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():23-29. PubMed ID: 28736113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
