These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3741965)

  • 1. An optical and electron microscopy study of materials implanted in the rat middle ear. II. A bioactive glass ceramic.
    Williams KR; Blayney AW
    Biomaterials; 1986 Jul; 7(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 3741965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An optical and electron microscopy study of materials implanted in the rat middle ear. I Carbon.
    Williams KR; Blayney AW
    Biomaterials; 1986 Jul; 7(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 3755624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scanning electron microscopy study of the interface between ceramics and bone.
    Williams KR; Blayney AW; Frootko NJ; Ashton BA
    Biomaterials; 1985 Jul; 6(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 4052540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Apatite formation on the surface of Ceravital-type glass-ceramic in the body.
    Ohtsuki C; Kushitani H; Kokubo T; Kotani S; Yamamuro T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Nov; 25(11):1363-70. PubMed ID: 1797808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tissue reactions to glass ceramics in the middle ear.
    Reck R
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1981 Feb; 6(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 7273453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite ceramic: a study of retrieved human middle ear implants.
    van Blitterswijk CA; Hesseling SC; Grote JJ; Koerten HK; de Groot K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Apr; 24(4):433-53. PubMed ID: 2161412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [5 years of clinical experience with Ceravital prostheses in the middle ear].
    Reck R
    HNO; 1985 Apr; 33(4):166-70. PubMed ID: 3997578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The bioactive glass ceramic Ceravital in ear surgery. Five years' experience.
    Reck R; Helms J
    Am J Otol; 1985 May; 6(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 4003541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ceravital in ossiculoplasty: experimental studies and early clinical results.
    Blayney AW; Bebear JP; Williams KR; Portmann M
    J Laryngol Otol; 1986 Dec; 100(12):1359-66. PubMed ID: 3543181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of ultrastructures of the interfaces between four kinds of surface-active ceramic and bone.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Bando Y
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Nov; 26(11):1419-32. PubMed ID: 1447227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tissue response of several polymeric materials implanted in the rat middle ear.
    Williams KR; Blayney AW
    Biomaterials; 1987 Jul; 8(4):254-8. PubMed ID: 3663802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory brain-stem responses in guinea pigs following middle ear implantation of Ceravital.
    Zikk D; Rapoport Y; Bloom J; Himelfarb MZ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1990; 248(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2282210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Apatite formation on three kinds of bioactive material at an early stage in vivo: a comparative study by transmission electron microscopy.
    Neo M; Nakamura T; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T; Yamamuro T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Aug; 27(8):999-1006. PubMed ID: 8408128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The early host and material response of bone-bonding and non-bonding glass-ceramic implants as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry.
    Müller-Mai C; Voigt C; Knarse W; Sela J; Gross UM
    Biomaterials; 1991 Nov; 12(9):865-71. PubMed ID: 1764559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interface reactions between machinable bioactive glass-ceramics and bone.
    Höland W; Vogel W; Naumann K; Gummel J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985 Mar; 19(3):303-12. PubMed ID: 4077884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in ceramic-bone interface between surface-active ceramics and resorbable ceramics: a study by scanning and transmission electron microscopy.
    Neo M; Kotani S; Fujita Y; Nakamura T; Yamamuro T; Bando Y; Ohtsuki C; Kokubo T
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1992 Feb; 26(2):255-67. PubMed ID: 1569117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of borate bioactive glass scaffolds with different pore sizes in a rat subcutaneous implantation model.
    Deliormanli AM; Liu X; Rahaman MN
    J Biomater Appl; 2014 Jan; 28(5):643-53. PubMed ID: 23241965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Scanning electron microscopy study of cell growth on mechanically produced biovitroceramic and carbon glass in vitro and in vivo].
    Beleites E; Neupert G; Augsten G; Vogel W; Schubert H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Apr; 64(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 4010410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compatibility and long-term stability of glass-ceramic implants.
    Blenckè BA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1978 May; 12(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 670254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle.
    Hench LL; Paschall HA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1973; 7(3):25-42. PubMed ID: 4123968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.