These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3741976)

  • 1. Estimation of response to selection and utilization of control populations for additional information and accuracy.
    Muir WM
    Biometrics; 1986 Jun; 42(2):381-91. PubMed ID: 3741976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On improved calibrations of unknowns in a system of quality-controlled assays.
    Hochberg Y; Marom I; Keret R; Peleg S
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 6871366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analyzing optima in the exploration of multiple response surfaces.
    Böckenholt U
    Biometrics; 1989 Sep; 45(3):1001-8. PubMed ID: 2790112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias and power in the estimation of a maternal family variance component in the presence of incomplete and incorrect pedigree information.
    Roughsedge T; Brotherstone S; Visscher PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Apr; 84(4):944-50. PubMed ID: 11352171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of repeated measures in regression models with measurement error.
    Liu X; Liang KY
    Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):645-54. PubMed ID: 1637986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method for dealing with measurement error in explanatory variables of regression models.
    Freedman LS; Fainberg V; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Carroll RJ
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 15032787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
    Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fully parametric and semi-parametric regression models for common events with covariate measurement error in main study/validation study designs.
    Spiegelman D; Casella M
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):395-409. PubMed ID: 9192443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complementary log-log regression for the estimation of covariate-adjusted prevalence ratios in the analysis of data from cross-sectional studies.
    Penman AD; Johnson WD
    Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 19588454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trading variance reduction with unbiasedness: the regularized subspace information criterion for robust model selection in kernel regression.
    Sugiyama M; Kawanabe M; Müller KR
    Neural Comput; 2004 May; 16(5):1077-104. PubMed ID: 15070511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum likelihood estimation of variance components for a multivariate mixed model with equal design matrices.
    Meyer K
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 4005372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regression analysis of longitudinal binary data with time-dependent environmental covariates: bias and efficiency.
    Schildcrout JS; Heagerty PJ
    Biostatistics; 2005 Oct; 6(4):633-52. PubMed ID: 15917376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection.
    Hersch EI; Phillips PC
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):479-85. PubMed ID: 15119432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A resampling approach for adjustment in prediction models for covariate measurement error.
    Li W; Mazumdar S; Arena VC; Sussman N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Mar; 77(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 15721649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the biases in the estimation of deleterious mutation parameters from natural populations at mutation-selection balance.
    Caballero A
    Genet Res; 2006 Dec; 88(3):177-89. PubMed ID: 17371612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aerial monitoring of marine waterfowl in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea.
    Johnson SR; Noel LE; Gazey WJ; Hawkes VC
    Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Sep; 108(1-3):1-43. PubMed ID: 16160776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.
    Borchers DL; Efford MG
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 17970815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting and correcting bias caused by measurement error in line transect sampling using multiplicative error models.
    Marques TA
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):757-63. PubMed ID: 15339299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.