BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3741979)

  • 1. Testing for simple independent action between two factors for dichotomous response data.
    Piegorsch WW; Weinberg CR; Haseman JK
    Biometrics; 1986 Jun; 42(2):413-9. PubMed ID: 3741979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal nonresponse models for repeated categorical measurements.
    Conaway MR
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1102-16. PubMed ID: 7786991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On pooling across strata when frequency matching has been followed in a cohort study.
    Weinberg CR
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 4005370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A note on P-values under group sequential testing and nonproportional hazards.
    Gillen DL; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):546-51. PubMed ID: 16011703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Paired versus two-sample design for a clinical trial of treatments with dichotomous outcome: power considerations.
    Wacholder S; Weinberg CR
    Biometrics; 1982 Sep; 38(3):801-12. PubMed ID: 7171700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size determination for confidence intervals on the population mean and on the difference between two population means.
    Beal SL
    Biometrics; 1989 Sep; 45(3):969-77. PubMed ID: 2790131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of maximum statistics for hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative.
    Zheng G; Chen Z
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 15737101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On approximate sample sizes for comparing two independent proportions with the use of Yates' correction.
    Ury HK; Fleiss JL
    Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 7407322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of interaction between carcinogens in long-term factorially designed animal experiments.
    Machado SG; Bailey KR
    Biometrics; 1985 Jun; 41(2):539-45. PubMed ID: 4027328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proof of safety vs proof of hazard.
    Millard SP
    Biometrics; 1987 Sep; 43(3):719-25. PubMed ID: 3663826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring simple independent action in multifactor tables of proportions.
    Piegorsch WW; Weinberg CR; Margolin BH
    Biometrics; 1988 Jun; 44(2):595-603. PubMed ID: 3390513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Random-effects models for serial observations with binary response.
    Stiratelli R; Laird N; Ware JH
    Biometrics; 1984 Dec; 40(4):961-71. PubMed ID: 6534418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of the O'Brien-Fleming multiple testing procedure in the presence of intraclass correlation.
    Lui KJ
    Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):232-6. PubMed ID: 8086606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of dichotomous response data from certain toxicological experiments.
    Haseman JK; Kupper LL
    Biometrics; 1979 Mar; 35(1):281-93. PubMed ID: 574026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing hypotheses about interclass correlations from familial data.
    Konishi S
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 4005373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quick and simple approximation of sample sizes for comparing two independent binomial distributions: different-sample-size case.
    Lee YJ
    Biometrics; 1984 Mar; 40(1):239-41. PubMed ID: 6733231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biometrical modeling of twin and family data using standard mixed model software.
    Rabe-Hesketh S; Skrondal A; Gjessing HK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):280-8. PubMed ID: 17484777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for comparing the means of two independent log-normal samples.
    Zhou XH; Gao S; Hui SL
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1129-35. PubMed ID: 9290231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the homogeneity of kappa statistics.
    Donner A; Eliasziw M; Klar N
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 8934591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonparametric estimation of solid cancer size at metastasis and probability of presenting with metastasis at detection.
    Xu JL; Prorok PC
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):579-91. PubMed ID: 9192453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.