BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37420089)

  • 1. A Critical Review of the Literature Regarding the Selection of Long-Term Romantic Partners.
    Devenport S; Davis-McCabe C; Winter S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Oct; 52(7):3025-3042. PubMed ID: 37420089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consistency and inconsistency among romantic partners over time.
    Eastwick PW; Harden KP; Shukusky JA; Morgan TA; Joel S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Jun; 112(6):838-859. PubMed ID: 28253004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Euclidean Mate Value and Power of Choice on the Mating Market.
    Conroy-Beam D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2018 Feb; 44(2):252-264. PubMed ID: 29082804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mate Preferences for Warmth-Trustworthiness Predict Romantic Attraction in the Early Stages of Mate Selection and Satisfaction in Ongoing Relationships.
    Valentine KA; Li NP; Meltzer AL; Tsai MH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Feb; 46(2):298-311. PubMed ID: 31184259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.
    Eastwick PW; Eagly AH; Finkel EJ; Johnson SE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):993-1011. PubMed ID: 21767032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weight conversations in romantic relationships: What do they sound like and how do partners respond?
    Berge JM; Pratt K; Miller L
    Fam Syst Health; 2016 Sep; 34(3):213-220. PubMed ID: 27505071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shared social and emotional activities within adolescent romantic and non-romantic sexual relationships.
    Williams LR; Russell ST
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 May; 42(4):649-58. PubMed ID: 23297147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Romantic relationships and sexual activities of the first generation of youth living with HIV since birth.
    Fernet M; Wong K; Richard ME; Otis J; Lévy JJ; Lapointe N; Samson J; Morin G; Thériault J; Trottier G
    AIDS Care; 2011 Apr; 23(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 21271400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. We're Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships.
    Joel S; MacDonald G
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2021 Nov; 25(4):317-343. PubMed ID: 34247524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of the Experience of Weight-Based Stigmatization in Romantic Relationships.
    Côté M; Bégin C
    Curr Obes Rep; 2020 Sep; 9(3):280-287. PubMed ID: 32445130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Machiavellianism in long-term relationships: Competition, mate retention and sexual coercion.
    Brewer G; Abell L
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Jun; 56(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 25656335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intimate partner violence and the power of love: A qualitative systematic review.
    Pocock M; Jackson D; Bradbury-Jones C
    Health Care Women Int; 2020 Jun; 41(6):621-646. PubMed ID: 31204887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships.
    Gerlach TM; Arslan RC; Schultze T; Reinhard SK; Penke L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):313-330. PubMed ID: 28921999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. You are so beautiful... to me: seeing beyond biases and achieving accuracy in romantic relationships.
    Solomon BC; Vazire S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Sep; 107(3):516-28. PubMed ID: 25133729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. People overestimate their willingness to reject potential romantic partners by overlooking their concern for other people.
    Joel S; Teper R; MacDonald G
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 25344347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: a review and meta-analysis.
    Eastwick PW; Luchies LB; Finkel EJ; Hunt LL
    Psychol Bull; 2014 May; 140(3):623-665. PubMed ID: 23586697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understandings and experiences of visible difference and romantic relationships: A qualitative exploration.
    Sharratt ND; Jenkinson E; Moss T; Clarke A; Rumsey N
    Body Image; 2018 Dec; 27():32-42. PubMed ID: 30125758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Evolutionary Perspective on Mate Rejection.
    Kelly AJ; Dubbs SL; Barlow FK
    Evol Psychol; 2016; 14(4):1474704916678626. PubMed ID: 28024416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An examination of accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner's motives for health behaviour regulation.
    Berzins TL; LaBuda JE; Gere J
    Br J Health Psychol; 2018 Nov; 23(4):872-887. PubMed ID: 29882307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.