These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37420359)

  • 21. Finite-key analysis for twin-field quantum key distribution with composable security.
    Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17113. PubMed ID: 31745131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reference-frame-independent, measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using fewer quantum states.
    Lee D; Hong S; Cho YW; Lim HT; Han SW; Jung H; Moon S; Lee KJ; Kim YS
    Opt Lett; 2020 May; 45(9):2624-2627. PubMed ID: 32356832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. More optimal relativistic quantum key distribution.
    Bebrov G
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15377. PubMed ID: 36100618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution without Phase Locking.
    Li W; Zhang L; Lu Y; Li ZP; Jiang C; Liu Y; Huang J; Li H; Wang Z; Wang XB; Zhang Q; You L; Xu F; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 Jun; 130(25):250802. PubMed ID: 37418729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhancing the Security of the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution Protocol against Detector-Blinding Attacks via the Use of an Active Quantum Entropy Source in the Receiving Station.
    Stipčević M
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Nov; 25(11):. PubMed ID: 37998210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization.
    Zhang X; Wang Y; Jiang M; Lu Y; Li H; Zhou C; Bao W
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Apr; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 33922572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the (relation between) efficiency and secret key rate of QKD.
    Bebrov G
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3638. PubMed ID: 38351081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution with advantage distillation.
    Zhu JR; Zhang CM; Wang R; Li HW
    Opt Lett; 2023 Feb; 48(3):542-545. PubMed ID: 36723526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution for two independent parties.
    Xin J; Lu XM; Li X; Li G
    Opt Express; 2020 Apr; 28(8):11439-11450. PubMed ID: 32403655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Proof-of-Principle Experimental Demonstration of Twin-Field Type Quantum Key Distribution.
    Zhong X; Hu J; Curty M; Qian L; Lo HK
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Sep; 123(10):100506. PubMed ID: 31573297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improved statistical fluctuation analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with four-intensity decoy-state method.
    Mao CC; Zhou XY; Zhu JR; Zhang CH; Zhang CM; Wang Q
    Opt Express; 2018 May; 26(10):13289-13300. PubMed ID: 29801354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biased decoy-state measurement-device-independent quantum cryptographic conferencing with finite resources.
    Chen R; Bao W; Zhou C; Li H; Wang Y; Bao H
    Opt Express; 2016 Mar; 24(6):6594-605. PubMed ID: 27136849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Practical passive decoy state measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with unstable sources.
    Liu L; Guo FZ; Wen QY
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11370. PubMed ID: 28900106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 1000 km Fiber Distance.
    Liu Y; Zhang WJ; Jiang C; Chen JP; Zhang C; Pan WX; Ma D; Dong H; Xiong JM; Zhang CJ; Li H; Wang RC; Wu J; Chen TY; You L; Wang XB; Zhang Q; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2023 May; 130(21):210801. PubMed ID: 37295116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Asynchronous measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with hybrid source.
    Bai JL; Xie YM; Fu Y; Yin HL; Chen ZB
    Opt Lett; 2023 Jul; 48(13):3551-3554. PubMed ID: 37390178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with leaky sources.
    Wang W; Tamaki K; Curty M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1678. PubMed ID: 33462254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Practical Security of High-Dimensional Quantum Key Distribution with Intensity Modulator Extinction.
    Wang Y; Du GH; Xu YB; Zhou C; Jiang MS; Li HW; Bao WS
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Mar; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 35455123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Randomness determines practical security of BB84 quantum key distribution.
    Li HW; Yin ZQ; Wang S; Qian YJ; Chen W; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16200. PubMed ID: 26552359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Finite-key bound for semi-device-independent quantum key distribution.
    Zhou C; Xu P; Bao WS; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang MS; Li HW
    Opt Express; 2017 Jul; 25(15):16971-16980. PubMed ID: 28789196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters.
    Lucamarini M; Yuan ZL; Dynes JF; Shields AJ
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):400-403. PubMed ID: 29720656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.