These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37420409)

  • 1. Preparation and Analysis of Two-Dimensional Four-Qubit Entangled States with Photon Polarization and Spatial Path.
    Zhao J; Wang M; Sun B; Cao L; Yang Y; Liu X; Zhang Q; Lu H; Driscoll KA
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Sep; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 37420409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preparation and measurement of three-qubit entanglement in a superconducting circuit.
    Dicarlo L; Reed MD; Sun L; Johnson BR; Chow JM; Gambetta JM; Frunzio L; Girvin SM; Devoret MH; Schoelkopf RJ
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):574-8. PubMed ID: 20882013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extreme violation of local realism with a hyper-entangled four-photon-eight-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zelinger state.
    Lu HX; Cao LZ; Zhao JQ; Li YD; Wang XQ
    Sci Rep; 2014 Mar; 4():4476. PubMed ID: 24667345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Generation of three-qubit entangled states using superconducting phase qubits.
    Neeley M; Bialczak RC; Lenander M; Lucero E; Mariantoni M; O'Connell AD; Sank D; Wang H; Weides M; Wenner J; Yin Y; Yamamoto T; Cleland AN; Martinis JM
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):570-3. PubMed ID: 20882012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Entanglement in a 20-Qubit Superconducting Quantum Computer.
    Mooney GJ; Hill CD; Hollenberg LCL
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13465. PubMed ID: 31530848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonlocal realism tests and quantum state tomography in Sagnac-based type-II polarization-entanglement SPDC-source.
    Motazedifard A; Madani SA; Dashkasan JJ; Vayaghan NS
    Heliyon; 2021 Jun; 7(6):e07384. PubMed ID: 34258455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Demonstration of hypergraph-state quantum information processing.
    Huang J; Li X; Chen X; Zhai C; Zheng Y; Chi Y; Li Y; He Q; Gong Q; Wang J
    Nat Commun; 2024 Mar; 15(1):2601. PubMed ID: 38521765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Entangled States Are Harder to Transfer than Product States.
    Apollaro TJG; Lorenzo S; Plastina F; Consiglio M; Życzkowski K
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Dec; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 36673187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantum tomography of an entangled three-qubit state in silicon.
    Takeda K; Noiri A; Nakajima T; Yoneda J; Kobayashi T; Tarucha S
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2021 Sep; 16(9):965-969. PubMed ID: 34099899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multipartite quantum entanglement creation for distant stationary systems.
    Li T; Wang Z; Xia K
    Opt Express; 2020 Jan; 28(2):1316-1329. PubMed ID: 32121845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct transfer of classical non-separable states into hybrid entangled two photon states.
    Jabir MV; Apurv Chaitanya N; Mathew M; Samanta GK
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):7331. PubMed ID: 28779165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complete tomography of a high-fidelity solid-state entangled spin-photon qubit pair.
    De Greve K; McMahon PL; Yu L; Pelc JS; Jones C; Natarajan CM; Kim NY; Abe E; Maier S; Schneider C; Kamp M; Höfling S; Hadfield RH; Forchel A; Fejer MM; Yamamoto Y
    Nat Commun; 2013; 4():2228. PubMed ID: 23887066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Entanglement of remote atomic qubits.
    Matsukevich DN; Chanelière T; Jenkins SD; Lan SY; Kennedy TA; Kuzmich A
    Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Jan; 96(3):030405. PubMed ID: 16486672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement-Device-Independent Entanglement Witness of Tripartite Entangled States and Its Applications.
    Li ZD; Zhao Q; Zhang R; Liu LZ; Yin XF; Zhang X; Fei YY; Chen K; Liu NL; Xu F; Chen YA; Li L; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Apr; 124(16):160503. PubMed ID: 32383895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental violation of Mermin steering inequality by three-photon entangled states with nontrivial GHZ-fidelity.
    Li J; Liu TJ; Wang S; Jebarathinam C; Wang Q
    Opt Express; 2019 Apr; 27(9):13559-13567. PubMed ID: 31052876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom.
    Thomas P; Ruscio L; Morin O; Rempe G
    Nature; 2022 Aug; 608(7924):677-681. PubMed ID: 36002484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid quantum logic and a test of Bell's inequality using two different atomic isotopes.
    Ballance CJ; Schäfer VM; Home JP; Szwer DJ; Webster SC; Allcock DT; Linke NM; Harty TP; Aude Craik DP; Stacey DN; Steane AM; Lucas DM
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):384-6. PubMed ID: 26672554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-efficient entanglement distillation from photon loss and decoherence.
    Wang TJ; Wang C
    Opt Express; 2015 Nov; 23(24):31550-63. PubMed ID: 26698778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental violation of local realism by four-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement.
    Zhao Z; Yang T; Chen YA; Zhang AN; Zukowski M; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Oct; 91(18):180401. PubMed ID: 14611269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deterministic generation of multiparticle entanglement by quantum Zeno dynamics.
    Barontini G; Hohmann L; Haas F; Estève J; Reichel J
    Science; 2015 Sep; 349(6254):1317-21. PubMed ID: 26383948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.