These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3742111)

  • 1. Two-channel compression hearing aids.
    Martin MC; King AB
    Br J Audiol; 1986 Aug; 20(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 3742111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of the guess factor on the speech reception threshold.
    Burke LE; Nerbonne MA
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(3):87-90. PubMed ID: 299592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefit of hearing aids: influence of hearing loss and age.
    Welzl-Müller K; Stephan K
    Scand Audiol; 1986; 15(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 3749780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 3950200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired.
    Plomp R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 3724108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Hearing Handicap Scale as a measure of hearing aid benefit.
    Tannahill JC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1979 Feb; 44(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 423559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Laurence RF; Wright D
    Br J Audiol; 1985 Aug; 19(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 4063555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Sensible utilization of modern hearing aid technique. II: Multiple channel compression].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 1996 May; 44(5):273-85. PubMed ID: 8707635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Users' satisfaction with hearing aids.
    Cunningham DR; Merle KS; Drake J
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 299591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of an adaptive filter hearing aid on speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired subjects.
    van Tasell DJ; Larsen SY; Fabry DA
    Ear Hear; 1988 Feb; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 3342940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using multichannel wide-dynamic range compression in severely hearing-impaired listeners: effects on speech recognition and quality.
    Souza PE; Jenstad LM; Folino R
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 15809540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions.
    Nabelek AK; Tampas JW; Burchfield SB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1001-11. PubMed ID: 15603458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of two signal-processing hearing aids.
    Dempsey JJ; Linzalone TG
    J Commun Disord; 1991 Jun; 24(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 1939723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictability of speech-in-noise performance from real ear measures of directional hearing AIDS.
    Dhar S; Humes LE; Calandruccio L; Barlow NN; Hipskind N
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 15064660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A reexamination of the one-half gain rule.
    Berger KW; Hagberg EN; Rane RL
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 7409361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing-aid outcome measured following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly.
    Humes LE; Garner CB; Wilson DL; Barlow NN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):469-86. PubMed ID: 11407554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic free-field headphone as hearing aid transducer. A preliminary report.
    Nielsen KO; Nielsen SS; Nielsen HB
    Scand Audiol; 1986; 15(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 3749778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of frequency-selective attenuation on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in conditions of low-frequency noise.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):885-94. PubMed ID: 1939893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of a programmable three-channel automatic gain control amplification system.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Audiology; 1991; 30(2):70-81. PubMed ID: 1877900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
    Kortlang S; Chen Z; Gerkmann T; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.