These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37421158)

  • 1. Comparison of fetal safety of vaginal Misoprostol tablet and Dinoprostone gel for induction of labor: An open-label randomized control trial.
    Samanta A; Rakshit BM; Mistri PK; Chakraborty A; Bag T; Das P; Pande A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2267-2272. PubMed ID: 37421158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
    Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term.
    Duro-Gómez J; Garrido-Oyarzún MF; Rodríguez-Marín AB; de la Torre González AJ; Arjona-Berral JE; Castelo-Branco C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Oct; 296(4):777-781. PubMed ID: 28831553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial.
    Dodd JM; Crowther CA; Robinson JS
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7540):509-13. PubMed ID: 16455695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Excessive uterine activity accompanying induced labor.
    Crane JM; Young DC; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):926-31. PubMed ID: 11384698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial.
    De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Envid Lázaro BM; Franco Royo MJ; Roca Arquillué M; Campillos Maza JM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
    Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Goffinet F; Durand-Zaleski I; Ville Y; Vayssiere C; Roberto A; Lahna Z; Nisand I; Fisch C; Chaumet-Riffaud P; Chastang C
    BJOG; 2001 Dec; 108(12):1255-62. PubMed ID: 11843388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term].
    Bagory H; De Broucker C; Tourneux P; Balcaen T; Gondry J; Foulon A; Sergent F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2022 Mar; 50(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 34871786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.
    Steetskamp J; Bachmann E; Hasenburg A; Battista MJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 32761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.