112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37421715)
1. PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation.
Lewin J; Schoenherr S; Seebass M; Lin M; Philpotts L; Etesami M; Butler R; Durand M; Heller S; Heacock L; Moy L; Tocino I; Westerhoff M
Clin Imaging; 2023 Sep; 101():200-205. PubMed ID: 37421715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories.
Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Peng H; Luo Y; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):314-321. PubMed ID: 29159811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Boyer B; Gauthier E; Helin V; Loshkajian A; Ragusa S; Delaloge S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification of mammographic breast density and its correlation with BI-RADS in elder women using machine learning approach.
Lee ZY; Goh YLE; Lai C
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2022 Mar; 53(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 34801440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
Østerås BH; Martinsen AC; Brandal SH; Chaudhry KN; Eben E; Haakenaasen U; Falk RS; Skaane P
Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.
Dratsch T; Chen X; Rezazade Mehrizi M; Kloeckner R; Mähringer-Kunz A; Püsken M; Baeßler B; Sauer S; Maintz D; Pinto Dos Santos D
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222176. PubMed ID: 37129490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.
Lehman CD; Yala A; Schuster T; Dontchos B; Bahl M; Swanson K; Barzilay R
Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30325282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation.
Gard CC; Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Taplin SH; Rutter CM
Breast J; 2015; 21(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 26133090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.
Lee J; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29363774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic Density Assessment by Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Assisted Diagnosis: A Comparison with Automated Volumetric Assessment.
Lee SE; Son NH; Kim MH; Kim EK
J Digit Imaging; 2022 Apr; 35(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 35015180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of mammographic breast density using a deep convolutional neural network.
Ciritsis A; Rossi C; Vittoria De Martini I; Eberhard M; Marcon M; Becker AS; Berger N; Boss A
Br J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 92(1093):20180691. PubMed ID: 30209957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and Validation of an AI-driven Mammographic Breast Density Classification Tool Based on Radiologist Consensus.
Magni V; Interlenghi M; Cozzi A; Alì M; Salvatore C; Azzena AA; Capra D; Carriero S; Della Pepa G; Fazzini D; Granata G; Monti CB; Muscogiuri G; Pellegrino G; Schiaffino S; Castiglioni I; Papa S; Sardanelli F
Radiol Artif Intell; 2022 Mar; 4(2):e210199. PubMed ID: 35391766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
Ekpo EU; Ujong UP; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1119-23. PubMed ID: 26999655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between software volumetric breast density estimates in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography images in a large public screening cohort.
Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Fieselmann A; Lång K; Sartor H
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):330-336. PubMed ID: 29943180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
