111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37421715)
21. A deep learning framework to classify breast density with noisy labels regularization.
Lopez-Almazan H; Javier Pérez-Benito F; Larroza A; Perez-Cortes JC; Pollan M; Perez-Gomez B; Salas Trejo D; Casals M; Llobet R
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 221():106885. PubMed ID: 35594581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multichannel DenseNet Architecture for Classification of Mammographic Breast Density for Breast Cancer Detection.
Pawar SD; Sharma KK; Sapate SG; Yadav GY; Alroobaea R; Alzahrani SM; Hedabou M
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():885212. PubMed ID: 35548086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density Interpretation.
Alshafeiy TI; Wadih A; Nicholson BT; Rochman CM; Peppard HR; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W36-W41. PubMed ID: 28504593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System.
Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Krupinski E; Mordang JJ; Schilling K; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 30457482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reported mammographic density: film-screen versus digital acquisition.
Harvey JA; Gard CC; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Geller BA; Onega TL;
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):752-8. PubMed ID: 23249570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA; Son EJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 23971465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast density (BD) assessment with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): Agreement between Quantra™ and 5th edition BI-RADS
Ekpo EU; Mello-Thoms C; Rickard M; Brennan PC; McEntee MF
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():185-190. PubMed ID: 27769015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reading High Breast Density Mammograms: Differences in Diagnostic Performance between Radiologists from Hong Kong SAR/Guangdong Province in China and Australia.
Li T; Taba ST; Khong PL; Tan TX; Trieu PDY; Chan E; Suleiman ME; Li Y; Brennan P; Lewis S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Sep; 21(9):2623-2629. PubMed ID: 32986361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Deep-LIBRA: An artificial-intelligence method for robust quantification of breast density with independent validation in breast cancer risk assessment.
Haji Maghsoudi O; Gastounioti A; Scott C; Pantalone L; Wu FF; Cohen EA; Winham S; Conant EF; Vachon C; Kontos D
Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102138. PubMed ID: 34274690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of automated volumetric breast density software in comparison with visual assessments in an Asian population: A retrospective observational study.
Rahmat K; Ab Mumin N; Ramli Hamid MT; Fadzli F; Ng WL; Muhammad Gowdh NF
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(39):e22405. PubMed ID: 32991467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor dataset.
Sacchetto D; Morra L; Agliozzo S; Bernardi D; Björklund T; Brancato B; Bravetti P; Carbonaro LA; Correale L; Fantò C; Favettini E; Martincich L; Milanesio L; Mombelloni S; Monetti F; Morrone D; Pellegrini M; Pesce B; Petrillo A; Saguatti G; Stevanin C; Trimboli RM; Tuttobene P; Valentini M; Marra V; Frigerio A; Bert A; Sardanelli F
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 25929945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deep Learning in Mammography: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Multipurpose Image Analysis Software in the Detection of Breast Cancer.
Becker AS; Marcon M; Ghafoor S; Wurnig MC; Frauenfelder T; Boss A
Invest Radiol; 2017 Jul; 52(7):434-440. PubMed ID: 28212138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.
Tagliafico AS; Tagliafico G; Cavagnetto F; Calabrese M; Houssami N
Br J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 86(1031):20130255. PubMed ID: 24029631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A New Computer-Aided Diagnosis System with Modified Genetic Feature Selection for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Masses in Mammograms.
Boumaraf S; Liu X; Ferkous C; Ma X
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7695207. PubMed ID: 32462017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
