197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37422630)
1. Is automatic cephalometric software using artificial intelligence better than orthodontist experts in landmark identification?
Ye H; Cheng Z; Ungvijanpunya N; Chen W; Cao L; Gou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):467. PubMed ID: 37422630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of automatic cephalometric landmark identification using artificial intelligence.
Bulatova G; Kusnoto B; Grace V; Tsay TP; Avenetti DM; Sanchez FJC
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():37-42. PubMed ID: 34842346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence.
Bao H; Zhang K; Yu C; Li H; Cao D; Shu H; Liu L; Yan B
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):191. PubMed ID: 37005593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cephalometric analysis performance discrepancy between orthodontists and an artificial intelligence model using lateral cephalometric radiographs.
Guinot-Barona C; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Galán López L; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):555-565. PubMed ID: 37882509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the accuracy of fully automatic cephalometric analysis software with artificial intelligence algorithm.
Duran GS; Gökmen Ş; Topsakal KG; Görgülü S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Aug; 26(3):481-490. PubMed ID: 36648374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic cephalometric landmark identification with artificial intelligence: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.
Polizzi A; Leonardi R
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105056. PubMed ID: 38729291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human examination and artificial intelligence in cephalometric landmark detection-is AI ready to take over?
Indermun S; Shaik S; Nyirenda C; Johannes K; Mulder R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Sep; 52(6):20220362. PubMed ID: 37427581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic identification of posteroanterior cephalometric landmarks using a novel deep learning algorithm: a comparative study with human experts.
Lee H; Cho JM; Ryu S; Ryu S; Chang E; Jung YS; Kim JY
Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):15506. PubMed ID: 37726392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preciseness of artificial intelligence for lateral cephalometric measurements.
El-Dawlatly M; Attia KH; Abdelghaffar AY; Mostafa YA; Abd El-Ghafour M
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 May; 85(Suppl 1):27-33. PubMed ID: 36894679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration in Cephalometric Landmark Detection.
Le VNT; Kang J; Oh IS; Kim JG; Yang YM; Lee DW
J Pers Med; 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35330386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence software.
Menezes LDS; Silva TP; Lima Dos Santos MA; Hughes MM; Mariano Souza SDR; Leite Ribeiro PM; Freitas PHL; Takeshita WM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230065. PubMed ID: 37869886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms.
Lindner C; Wang CW; Huang CT; Li CH; Chang SW; Cootes TF
Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33581. PubMed ID: 27645567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of AudaxCeph®'s fully automated cephalometric tracing technology to a semi-automated approach by human examiners.
Ristau B; Coreil M; Chapple A; Armbruster P; Ballard R
Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100691. PubMed ID: 36114136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commercial artificial intelligence lateral cephalometric analysis: part 1-the possibility of replacing manual landmarking with artificial intelligence service.
Lee J; Bae SR; Noh HK
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Nov; 47(6):106-118. PubMed ID: 37997242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
de Queiroz Tavares Borges Mesquita G; Vieira WA; Vidigal MTC; Travençolo BAN; Beaini TL; Spin-Neto R; Paranhos LR; de Brito Júnior RB
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Jun; 36(3):1158-1179. PubMed ID: 36604364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of linear and angular cephalometric measurements obtained by an artificial-intelligence assisted software (WebCeph) in comparison with digital software (AutoCEPH) and manual tracing method.
Prince STT; Srinivasan D; Duraisamy S; Kannan R; Rajaram K
Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(1):e2321214. PubMed ID: 37018830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:
Hwang HW; Park JH; Moon JH; Yu Y; Kim H; Her SB; Srinivasan G; Aljanabi MNA; Donatelli RE; Lee SJ
Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31335162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hendrickx J; Gracea RS; Vanheers M; Winderickx N; Preda F; Shujaat S; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 38895901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial intelligence system for automated landmark localization and analysis of cephalometry.
Jiang F; Guo Y; Yang C; Zhou Y; Lin Y; Cheng F; Quan S; Feng Q; Li J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Jan; 52(1):20220081. PubMed ID: 36279185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of cephalometric identification performed by 2 artificial intelligence-driven tracing applications and human examiners.
Silva TP; Pinheiro MCR; Freitas DQ; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2024 Apr; 137(4):431-440. PubMed ID: 38365543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
