159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37422770)
1. The effect of pre-ceramic soldering on marginal and internal fit of 4-unit zirconia frameworks and monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Ozkan Irem D; Alpkilic DS; Isler Deger S
Odontology; 2024 Jan; 112(1):169-176. PubMed ID: 37422770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of Preceramic Soldering on Fracture Resistance of 4-Unit Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses.
İrem DÖ; Cömert ZY; Alpkılıç DŞ; Keleşoğlu E; İşler Değer S
J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):815-821. PubMed ID: 35118772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal Vertical Discrepancies of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Gonzalo E; Pelaez J; Serrano B; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 27148985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
López-Suárez C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 19639075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study.
Bayramoğlu E; Özkan YK; Yildiz C
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25858218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In Vitro Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit of Press-on-Metal Ceramic (PoM) Restorations with Zirconium-Supported and Conventional Metal Ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures Before and After Veneering.
Varol S; Kulak-Özkan Y
J Prosthodont; 2015 Jul; 24(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 25274041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.
Schönberger J; Erdelt KJ; Bäumer D; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2629-2635. PubMed ID: 28160108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of convergence angle and cement space on adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings.
Iwai T; Komine F; Kobayashi K; Saito A; Matsumura H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 18607834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated from translucent multicolored zirconia: Framework versus complete contour design.
Ueda K; Watanabe F; Katsuta Y; Seto M; Ueno D; Hiroyasu K; Suzuki S; Erdelt K; Güth JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):340.e1-340.e6. PubMed ID: 33198991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fatigue behavior of zirconia-ceramic, galvano-ceramic, and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures.
Eroğlu Z; Gurbulak AG
J Prosthodont; 2013 Oct; 22(7):516-522. PubMed ID: 23735078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical comparison of zirconia, metal and alumina fixed-prosthesis frameworks veneered with layered or pressed ceramic: a three-year report.
Christensen RP; Ploeger BJ
J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Nov; 141(11):1317-29. PubMed ID: 21037189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
