These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37422770)

  • 21. Marginal fit of implant-supported all-ceramic zirconia frameworks.
    Zaghloul HH; Younis JF
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 39(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 23964776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Effect of materials and superstructure designs on the passive fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses].
    Song S; Zheng Z; Yang LY; Gao X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 30854816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal and Internal Discrepancies of Posterior Zirconia-Based Crowns Fabricated with Three Different CAD/CAM Systems Versus Metal-Ceramic.
    Ortega R; Gonzalo E; Gomez-Polo M; Suárez MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 26340011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.
    Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Spiekermann H; Anusavice KJ
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11504436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance of zirconia ceramic cantilever fixed dental prostheses: 3-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study.
    Zenthöfer A; Ohlmann B; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25882973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
    Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
    Martinez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Ozcan M; Pradies G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal and internal fit of pre-sintered Co-Cr and zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses as measured using microcomputed tomography.
    Daou EE; Ounsi H; Özcan M; Al-Haj Husain N; Salameh Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):409-414. PubMed ID: 29724558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of the fabrication process on the in vitro performance of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia substructures.
    Rosentritt M; Kolbeck C; Handel G; Schneider-Feyrer S; Behr M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):1007-12. PubMed ID: 20922439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of Thermomechanical and Static Loading on the Load to Fracture of Metal-Ceramic, Monolithic, and Veneered Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Lopez-Suarez C; Tobar C; Sola-Ruiz MF; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 30548895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative fracture behavior of monolithic and veneered zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
    Lopez-Suarez C; Rodriguez V; Pelaez J; Agustin-Panadero R; Suarez MJ
    Dent Mater J; 2017 Nov; 36(6):816-821. PubMed ID: 28845035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy.
    Kohorst P; Junghanns J; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):527-36. PubMed ID: 20495937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns.
    Del Piñal M; Lopez-Suarez C; Bartolome JF; Volpato CA; Suarez MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):323.e1-323.e7. PubMed ID: 33176924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fit of zirconia fixed partial dentures fabricated from conventional impressions and digital scans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Morsy N; El Kateb M; Azer A; Fathalla S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 34696907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microveneering technique for esthetic enhancement of monolithic zirconia restorations.
    Kurbad A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 27274564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.