These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37422857)
1. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive imaging using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for the detection of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Li X; Wang L; Guo P; Sun Q; Zhang Y; Chen C; Zhang Y Ann Nucl Med; 2023 Oct; 37(10):541-550. PubMed ID: 37422857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Staging/restaging performance of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A review and meta-analysis. Lin CY; Lin CL; Kao CH Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():158-165. PubMed ID: 30292261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of MRI, SPECT, and PET in detecting renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yin Q; Xu H; Zhong Y; Ni J; Hu S BMC Cancer; 2022 Feb; 22(1):163. PubMed ID: 35148700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer: which one is the best?--a meta-analysis. Liu T; Xu JY; Xu W; Bai YR; Yan WL; Yang HL Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2011 Jun; 23(5):350-8. PubMed ID: 21094027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis. Choi HJ; Ju W; Myung SK; Kim Y Cancer Sci; 2010 Jun; 101(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20298252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Cheng X; Li Y; Liu B; Xu Z; Bao L; Wang J Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):615-27. PubMed ID: 22734080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for the Detection of Recurrent Disease after Treatment of Malignant Melanoma. Lee JW; Nam SB; Kim SJ Oncology; 2019; 97(5):286-293. PubMed ID: 31437839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT with bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis: a meta-analysis. Cheng X; Li Y; Xu Z; Bao L; Li D; Wang J Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):779-87. PubMed ID: 21712464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic test accuracies of F-18 FDG PET for characterisation of cardiac masses compared to conventional imaging techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis. Kim K; Ko WS; Kim SJ Br J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 95(1135):20210263. PubMed ID: 35612548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging versus positron emission tomography-computed tomography for the staging of pediatric lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bhalla D; Jana M; Kandasamy D Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Dec; 53(13):2683-2691. PubMed ID: 37814104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic value of PET/CT versus PET/MRI in gynecological malignancies of the pelvis: A meta-analysis. Virarkar M; Ganeshan D; Devine C; Bassett R; Kuchana V; Bhosale P Clin Imaging; 2020 Mar; 60(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 31864201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct comparison of choline PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Huang SM; Yin L; Yue JL; Li YF; Yang Y; Lin ZC Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Dec; 97(50):e13344. PubMed ID: 30557983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency for local recurrence of rectal cancer using CT, MRI, PET and PET-CT: A systematic review protocol. Shao H; Ma X; Gao Y; Wang J; Wu J; Wang B; Li J; Tian J Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(48):e12900. PubMed ID: 30508883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis. Zhang C; Liang Z; Liu W; Zeng X; Mo Y BMC Cancer; 2023 Jan; 23(1):37. PubMed ID: 36624425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET versus magnetic resonance imaging for detecting spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yin Y; Liu X; Yang X; Guo J; Wang Q; Chen L Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2323-2332. PubMed ID: 30121323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Machado Medeiros T; Altmayer S; Watte G; Zanon M; Basso Dias A; Henz Concatto N; Hoefel Paes J; Mattiello R; de Souza Santos F; Mohammed TL; Verma N; Hochhegger B Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3641-3649. PubMed ID: 32125513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A two-way comparison of whole-body 18FDG PET-CT and whole-body contrast-enhanced MRI for distant metastasis staging in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies. Li J; Zhou H; Zhang X; Song F; Pang X; Wei Z Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Mar; 9(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 32233618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI and SPECT in the diagnosis of local residual/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Wei J; Pei S; Zhu X Oral Oncol; 2016 Jan; 52():11-7. PubMed ID: 26547126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnostic accuracy of staging in patients with cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis. Huang X; Yang J; Li J; Xiong Y Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Aug; 99(35):e20932. PubMed ID: 32871859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct comparison of diagnostic accuracies of F-18 FDG PET and MRI for detection of bone marrow involvement in lymphoma patients; A meta-analysis. Kim K; Kim SJ Leuk Res; 2020 Dec; 99():106475. PubMed ID: 33189988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]